Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30117261›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2018

A patient-derived explant (PDE) model of hormone-dependent cancer.

Margaret M Centenera, Theresa E Hickey, Shalini Jindal, Natalie K Ryan, Preethi Ravindranathan, Hisham Mohammed, Jessica L Robinson, Matthew J Schiewer, Shihong Ma, Payal Kapur and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protein disulfide isomerases regulate androgen receptor stability and promote prostate cancer cell growth and survival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Advances and challenges in human 3D solid tumor models.Advanced functional materials · 2025
    Article
  11. Thieno[2,3-Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Advancements in 3D In Vitro Models for Colorectal Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A novel preclinical model of the normal human breast.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Margaret M CenteneraFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Theresa E HickeyDame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Shalini JindalDame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Natalie K RyanFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Preethi RavindranathanDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA.
Hisham MohammedKnight Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Jessica L RobinsonTranscription Factor Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge University, UK.
Matthew J SchiewerKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shihong MaDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA.
Payal KapurDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA.
Peter D SutherlandUrology Unit, Surgical Specialties Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, SA, Australia.
Clive E HoffmannBreast Clinic, Burnside War Memorial Hospital, Toorak Gardens, SA, Australia.
Claus G RoehrbornDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA.
Leonard G GomellaDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jason S CarrollTranscription Factor Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge University, UK.
Stephen N BirrellBreast Clinic, Burnside War Memorial Hospital, Toorak Gardens, SA, Australia.
Karen E KnudsenKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ganesh V RajDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA.
Lisa M ButlerFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Wayne D TilleyFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

Cyclin D1: repercussions of AR control and alternative splicing in prostate canceR01CA099996 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2003 to 2013
$2.6M
Endocrine disruptors: AR regulation and prostate cancerR01ES016675 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
Role of BAF57 in AR control and prostate cancer growthR01CA116777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
Cancer Research UK 20411NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099996NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116777NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast and prostate cancer research to date has largely been predicated on the use of cell lines in vitro or in vivo. These limitations have led to the development of more clinically relevant models, such as organoids or murine xenografts that utilize patient-derived material; however, issues related to low take rate, long duration of establishment, and the associated costs constrain use of these models. This study demonstrates that ex vivo culture of freshly resected breast and prostate tumor specimens obtained from surgery, termed patient-derived explants (PDEs), provides a high-throughput and cost-effective model that retains the native tissue architecture, microenvironment, cell viability, and key oncogenic drivers. The PDE model provides a unique approach for direct evaluation of drug responses on an individual patient's tumor, which is amenable to analysis using contemporary genomic technologies. The ability to rapidly evaluate drug efficacy in patient-derived material has high potential to facilitate implementation of personalized medicine approaches.

Indexed as

Patient-Specific ModelingBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationEpithelial CellsEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGelatin Sponge, AbsorbableHeterograftsHumansKi-67 AntigenMaleNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentOrganoidsPrecision MedicineProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenAR protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaKi-67 AntigenMKI67 protein, humanReceptors, Androgenex vivo culturepatient-derived explantpreclinical tumor model

Identifiers

PMID30117261
PMCPMC6120230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.