Trial reportCerebellum (London, England)2019
Both 50 and 30 Hz continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation depresses the cerebellum.
Trial report in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving balance capacity and activity of daily living in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Continuous theta burst stimulation to the medial posterior cerebellum impairs reversal learning in healthy volunteers.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cerebellar Brain Inhibition as a Function of TMS Coil Orientation.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Personalized non-invasive neuromodulation for sensory-based urge suppression in individuals with OCD: a proof-of-concept investigation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at the Cerebellum on Working Memory.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Consolidation of motor sequence learning eliminates susceptibility of SMAproper to TMS: a combined rTMS and cTBS study.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for lower extremity motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Neural regeneration research · 2021Review
- Cerebellar rTMS and PAS effectively induce cerebellar plasticity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation on Walking Function in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Consensus Paper: Experimental Neurostimulation of the Cerebellum.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The cerebellum is implicated in the pathophysiology of numerous movement disorders, which makes it an attractive target for noninvasive neurostimulation. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can induce long lasting plastic changes in human brain; however, the efficacy of different simulation protocols has not been investigated at the cerebellum. Here, we compare a traditional 50-Hz and a modified 30-Hz cTBS protocols at modulating cerebellar activity in healthy subjects. Seventeen healthy adults participated in two testing sessions where they received either 50-Hz (cTBS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.