Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30117070›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2018

All Along the Watchtower: a Case of Long QT Syndrome Misdiagnosis Secondary to Genetic Testing Misinterpretation.

Benjamin M Helm, Mark D Ayers, Adam C Kean

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Challenges in genetic testing: clinician variant interpretation processes and the impact on clinical care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin M HelmDepartment of Medical & Molecular Genetics, Riley Hospital for Children & Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, 975 West Walnut Street, IB-130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. bmhelm@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-0202
Mark D AyersDepartment of Pediatrics Division of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Adam C KeanDepartment of Pediatrics Division of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical genetics services continue to expand into diverse medical specialties. An ever-increasing number of non-genetics providers are independently ordering genetic tests, interpreting results, and at times, making diagnoses leading to patient care recommendations. Non-genetics healthcare providers can help increase patient access to these services, but a potential pitfall occurs when these providers either do not have adequate expertise with genetic variant interpretation or do not have access to multi-disciplinary teams including genetic counselors or clinical geneticists for advanced review. In the cardiology setting, variant misinterpretation can lead to misattribution of disease risk, unnecessary treatments or management, and potentially adverse psychosocial and financial effects. To address this, case reports and series are needed to highlight variant misinterpretation and misdiagnoses, including discussion of possible solutions and best practices for avoidance. This report details a child previously diagnosed with long QT syndrome type 4 by chromosomal microarray who was then subsequently managed for this disease by cardiac providers with insufficient expertise to critically review and question the genetic testing results. The patient was eventually referred to a pediatric electrophysiology team as part of a larger multidisciplinary cardiovascular genetics program, composed of specialist genetic counselors, cardiologists, and clinical geneticists. Advanced review and clinical evaluation raised concern about the initial genetic testing result and diagnosis. Complementary testing with a different modality to confirm or disconfirm the chromosome microarray result was performed, providing evidence that the original result reflected analytic error in the laboratory as well as interpretive error by the clinical geneticist and that the patient was misdiagnosed, and treated over the course of years, for long QT syndrome. This case shows the value of multidisciplinary teams caring for patients with inherited cardiovascular diseases.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsGenetic TestingChildHumansLong QT SyndromeMaleANK2Cardiovascular geneticsChromosome microarrayGenetic counselingLong QT syndromeMisdiagnosisMultidisciplinary

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.