Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30117001›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2018

Surveillance of Arboviruses in Primates and Sloths in the Atlantic Forest, Bahia, Brazil.

L S Catenacci, M Ferreira, L C Martins, K M De Vleeschouwer, C R Cassano, L C Oliveira, G Canale, S L Deem, J S Tello, P Parker and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

L S CatenacciCampus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Federal University of Piaui State, Rod municipal Bom Jesus Viana, BR135, km 1, Bom Jesus, PI, 64900-000, Brazil. li_vet@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-2257-7076
M FerreiraVirology Graduate Program, Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua, PA, 67030-000, Brazil.
L C MartinsVirology Graduate Program, Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua, PA, 67030-000, Brazil.
K M De VleeschouwerCentre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, 2018, Antwerp, Belgium.
C R CassanoState University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-900, Brazil.
L C OliveiraBicho do Mato Instituto de Pesquisa, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30360-082, Brazil.
G CanaleICNHS/NEBAM, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Campus Sinop, Cuiabá, MT, 78557-000, Brazil.
S L DeemSaint Louis Zoo Institute for Conservation Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
J S TelloCenter for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
P ParkerUniversity of Missouri-St Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63105, USA.
P F C VasconcelosVirology Graduate Program, Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua, PA, 67030-000, Brazil.
E S Travassos da RosaVirology Graduate Program, Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua, PA, 67030-000, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 2006 through 2014, we conducted seroepidemiological surveys on non-human primates and sloths to investigate the possible circulation of arboviruses in Bahia Atlantic Forest, Brazil. We collected a total of 196 samples from 103 Leontopithecus chrysomelas, 7 Sapajus xanthosternos, 22 Bradypus torquatus and 7 Bradypus variegatus. Serum samples were tested using neutralization test and hemagglutination inhibition test to detect total antibodies against 26 different arboviruses. The overall prevalence of arboviruses was 36.6% (51/139), with the genus Flavivirus having the highest prevalence (33.1%; 46/139), followed by Phlebovirus (5.0%; 7/139), Orthobunyavirus (4.3%; 6/139) and Alphavirus (0.7%; 1/139). Monotypic reactions suggest that the wild animals were exposed naturally to at least twelve arboviruses. Added results from the neutralization test, animals were exposed to thirteen arboviruses. Most of these viruses are maintained in transmission cycles independent of human hosts, although antibodies against dengue virus serotypes 1, 2 and 3 were found in this study. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting exposure to arboviruses in L. chrysomelas, S. xanthosternos and B. torquatus. Our results also highlight that the Southern Bahia Atlantic Forest has a variety of vertebrate hosts and potential vectors, which may support the emergence or re-emergence of arboviruses, including those pathogenic to humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsArbovirusesArbovirus InfectionsBrazilFemaleMalePrimatesSeroepidemiologic StudiesSerologic TestsSlothsArbovirusAtlantic ForestBradypus sp.Emerging infectious diseasesLeontopithecus sp.Sapajus sp.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.