ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2018
The Economics and Regulation of PRP in the Evolving Field of Orthopedic Biologics.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Autologous platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids or saline for knee osteoarthritis: can blood draw volume serve as a proxy for platelet dose? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2026Pooled it
- Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Improvement of Pain and Function in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Bias Assessment.The American journal of sports medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Intra-articular autologous conditioned serum and triamcinolone injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled, randomized, double-blind study.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Trial
- A randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular, autologous adipose tissue injections for the treatment of mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis compared to hyaluronic acid: a study protocol.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Trial
- Health Disparities in Orthobiologics: Factors Influencing Access to Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Patient Questions Regarding Orthobiologic Injections.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Laws and regulations on platelet-rich plasma use for musculoskeletal pathologies in South America: a narrative review.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Platelet-rich plasma-contained drug delivery systems to treat orthopedic injuries.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: An Umbrella Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Spin and reporting bias in the use of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Review
- Platelet-rich plasma improves pain and function in knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Use of platelet-rich plasma in rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2024Review
- Advancements in Therapeutic Approaches for Degenerative Tendinopathy: Evaluating Efficacy and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Identification of unapproved orthopedic regenerative medicine: Usefulness of the Act on Safety of Regenerative Medicine.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Pain Management Strategies in Osteoarthritis.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Safety of intraoperative autologous plasma incubation of corneal grafts for reducing endothelial cell loss: a pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Harnessing Healing Power: A Comprehensive Review on Platelet-Rich Plasma in Compound Fracture Care.Cureus · 2024Review
- Biotherapeutic Applications of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Regenerative Medicine.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Review
- Public Interest in Shoulder Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Is Increasing: A 10-Year Google Trends Analysis.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Assessment of Characteristics and Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Platelet-Rich Plasma in Musculoskeletal Medicine.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review provides an update on the current status of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Topics covered include the current regulatory environment, economic outlook, and current clinical evidence. RECENT
findingsThe global PRP market is expected to grow to between 380 million and 4.5 billion (USD) over the next 5-10 years. The cost of a single treatment, which is not covered by most insurance, is roughly $500-$2500, with patients often returning for additional treatments. While PRP is not 'FDA-approved', it can be legally offered in the clinic 'off-label' in the USA for a myriad of musculoskeletal indications. Recently published meta-analyses have demonstrated statistically significant improvements that, in some cases, suggest that PRP may have clinically meaningful effects. However, given the fact that clearance is not synonymous with approval, PRP is a costly treatment not covered by insurance, and clinical trials have not demonstrated definitive efficacy, we recommend informing patients when providing PRP 'off-label'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.