ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2018
Vertebral Fracture Identification as Part of a Comprehensive Risk Assessment in Patients with Osteoporosis.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global, regional, and national trends in spinal fracture burden from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2050.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Current applications of deep learning in vertebral fracture diagnosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Review
- Global burden of vertebral fractures from 1990 to 2021 and projections for the next three decades.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- The global burden of vertebral fractures caused by falls among individuals aged 55 and older, 1990 to 2021.PloS one · 2025Article
- Normative vertebral deformity measurements in a clinically relevant population using magnetic resonance imaging.World journal of radiology · 2024Article
- The Impact of Frailty on Spine Surgery: Systematic Review on 10 years Clinical Studies.Aging and disease · 2021Review
- Effect of estradiol on high glucose‑induced osteoblast injury.Molecular medicine reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review current evidence regarding the vertebral fracture prevalence, the accuracy of vertebral fracture identification on current imaging technologies, and the potential impact of vertebral fracture identification on fracture risk. RECENT
findingsImportant new studies have clarified the features of prevalent vertebral fracture that most strongly predict incident fractures. Age- and sex-stratified estimates of vertebral fracture prevalence on densitometric lateral spine images in the US population are now available. The accuracy of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment, how computed tomography scans and other spinal images obtained for indications other than vertebral fracture assessment can be leveraged to detect prevalent vertebral fractures, and the potential impact of vertebral fracture assessment on patient and provider fracture risk management behavior have been clarified. Substantial progress has been made regarding screening strategies using lateral spine imaging to detect prevalent vertebral fracture in the older population. Further research regarding implementation of these strategies in clinical practice and their impact on clinical outcomes is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.