Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30116971›Full record

ReviewPituitary2018

Medically induced CSF rhinorrhea following treatment of macroprolactinoma: case series and literature review.

Tomáš Česák, Pavel Poczos, Jaroslav Adamkov, Jiří Náhlovský, Petra Kašparová, Filip Gabalec, Petr Čelakovský, Ondrej Choutka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Italian Guidelines for the Management of Prolactinomas.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomáš ČesákDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-170X
Pavel PoczosDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. poczosp@lfhk.cuni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1456-3010
Jaroslav AdamkovDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2541-7382
Jiří NáhlovskýDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-968X
Petra KašparováThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5930-1922
Filip Gabalec4th Department of Internal Medicine - Haematology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7053-3369
Petr ČelakovskýDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-4373
Ondrej ChoutkaSaint Alphonsus Neuroscience Institute - Neurosurgery, Boise, ID, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-1549
Charles University · CZSaint Alphonsus Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough several reports have addressed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea following dopamine agonist (DA) therapy of macroprolactinomas, further study is warranted for this relatively uncommon entity. Toward this aim, our retrospective series and review of literature further clarifies recommendations in treatment of this rare problem.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all macroprolactinoma cases in our hospital for a 15-year period. Our systematic search of PubMed identified original articles and reviews of all macroprolactinoma cases with an associated medication-induced CSF leak.

resultsFive patients with drug-induced CSF leak were identified; four of these patients received cabergoline therapy an average of 6 weeks before the onset of rhinorrhea and then underwent surgical repair of the CSF leak. Of 35 published studies included, we identified 60 patients with medication-induced CSF leak. Medical therapy included bromocriptine in 34 patients, cabergoline in 21 patients, and use of both DAs in two patients. Three cases did include complete diagnostic and treatment data. Median time from initiation of the DA treatment to occurrence of rhinorrhea was 6 weeks. For CSF rhinorrhea, 49 patients underwent surgical repair (38 by the transnasal approach) and seven patients were treated nonoperatively.

conclusionBaseline skull base erosion in macroprolactinomas in combination with subsequent tumor shrinkage induced by DA therapy may result in spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea. Therefore, such patients should be advised about and monitored for this potential setback. Once CSF leak is diagnosed, prompt treatment must be carried out to avoid infectious complications. Transnasal surgery appears the most effective therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCerebrospinal Fluid LeakCerebrospinal Fluid RhinorrheaDopamine AgonistsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProlactinProlactinomaRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultDopamine AgonistsProlactinCerebrospinal fluid leakDopamine agonistsProlactinomaRhinorrhea

Identifiers

PMID30116971
OpenAlexW2886681289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.