Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30116959›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Radiomics nomogram for predicting the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumours preoperatively.

Tao Chen, Zhenyuan Ning, Lili Xu, Xingyu Feng, Shuai Han, Holger R Roth, Wei Xiong, Xixi Zhao, Yanfeng Hu, Hao Liu and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, No.1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China. drchentao@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1306-6538
Zhenyuan NingSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Lili XuMedical Image Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Xingyu FengDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Shuai HanDepartment of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510280, Guangdong Province, China.
Holger R RothGraduate School of Information Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8603, Japan.
Wei XiongMedical Image Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Xixi ZhaoMedical Image Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yanfeng HuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, No.1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Hao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, No.1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Jiang YuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, No.1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yu ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Yikai XuMedical Image Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Kensaku MoriGraduate School of Information Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8603, Japan.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, No.1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China. gzliguoxin@163.com.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI Grant 17H00867 and 26108006the State's Key Project of Research and Development Plan 2017YFC0108300 and 2017YFC0108303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and evaluate a radiomics nomogram for differentiating the malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

methodsA total of 222 patients (primary cohort: n = 130, our centre; external validation cohort: n = 92, two other centres) with pathologically diagnosed GISTs were enrolled. A Relief algorithm was used to select the feature subset with the best distinguishing characteristics and to establish a radiomics model with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier for malignant risk differentiation. Determinant clinical characteristics and subjective CT features were assessed to separately construct a corresponding model. The models showing statistical significance in a multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to develop a nomogram. The diagnostic performance of these models was evaluated using ROC curves. Further calibration of the nomogram was evaluated by calibration curves.

resultsThe generated radiomics model had an AUC value of 0.867 (95% CI 0.803-0.932) in the primary cohort and 0.847 (95% CI 0.765-0.930) in the external cohort. In the entire cohort, the AUCs for the radiomics model, subjective CT findings model, clinical index model and radiomics nomogram were 0.858 (95% CI 0.807-0.908), 0.774 (95% CI 0.713-0.835), 0.759 (95% CI 0.697-0.821) and 0.867 (95% CI 0.818-0.915), respectively. The nomogram showed good calibration.

conclusionsThis radiomics nomogram predicted the malignant potential of GISTs with excellent accuracy and may be used as an effective tool to guide preoperative clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS: • CT-based radiomics model can differentiate low- and high-malignant-potential GISTs with satisfactory accuracy compared with subjective CT findings and clinical indexes. • Radiomics nomogram integrated with the radiomics signature, subjective CT findings and clinical indexes can achieve individualised risk prediction with improved diagnostic performance. • This study might provide significant and valuable background information for further studies such as response evaluation of neoadjuvant imatinib and recurrence risk prediction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNomogramsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPreoperative PeriodROC CurveSupport Vector MachineTomography, X-Ray ComputedClassificationGastrointestinal stromal tumourMachine learningNomogramRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.