ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2018
Optimal sampling time and clinical implication of the SCN5A promoter haplotype in propafenone therapeutic drug monitoring.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe clinical usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of propafenone, a sodium channel blocker, has been unclear due to the lack of information regarding optimal blood sampling time and therapeutic concentration range. Antiarrhythmic effects of sodium channel blockers are affected by the activity of the cardiac sodium channel (SCN5A). We investigated the optimal sampling time and the clinical implication of the SCN5A promoter haplotype in propafenone TDM.
methodsWe evaluated serum concentrations of propafenone, the SCN5A promoter haplotype, and antiarrhythmic efficacy in 55 patients with supraventricular tachy-arrhythmias. Blood samples obtained 1.5-6 and 10-24 h after the last dose were categorized as peak and trough samples, respectively.
resultsThe peak propafenone concentration was significantly higher in effectively treated patients than that in patients showing insufficient response (337 ± 213 vs. 177 ± 93 ng/mL, P = 0.005), but the trough propafenone concentration was not significantly different between the two groups (68 ± 48 vs. 42 ± 36 ng/mL). Clinically relevant propafenone efficacy was achieved significantly more often in SCN5A haplotype B carriers than in wild-type haplotype A homozygotes (90 vs. 60%, P < 0.05). Among the haplotype A homozygotes, peak propafenone concentration was higher in effectively treated patients than that in patients showing insufficient response (299 ± 177 vs. 177 ± 93 ng/mL, P = 0.061).
conclusionThe present study found that antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone was associated with peak propafenone concentration rather than trough concentration and was affected by the SCN5A promoter haplotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.