ArticleInfection and immunity1986
Differential contribution of chemotaxins and opsonins to neutrophil-mediated killing of Schistosoma mansoni larvae.
Article in Infection and immunity, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Getting into host's skin: initial immune response toFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In neutrophil-mediated killing of schistosomula, antibody and serum complement serve two functions: (i) opsonization of the target pathogen and (ii) generation of cell-activating, chemotactic peptides. We studied neutrophil-mediated schistosomulum killing in experiments designed to isolate these functions of antibody and complement in the cell activation response of neutrophils to external pathogens. Schistosomula opsonized by antibody or antibody plus complement induced neutrophil-mediated killing, while complement-opsonized larvae did not. Antibody enhancement of cell-mediated killing correlated with increased cell-to-parasite adherence, while cell-mediated killing in the presence of fresh normal human serum (providing chemotactic factor stimulation and complement opsonization of larvae) demonstrated a dissociation between neutrophil adhesive and killing responses. Exogenous chemotactic stimuli were found to enhance significantly neutrophil-mediated killing of both opsonized and unopsonized larvae. Experiments involving parabiotic chambers confirmed that chemotactic-factor-stimulated neutrophils may cause significant parasite mortality without direct cell-parasite contact. In further analysis of the neutrophil response to surface and fluid-phase stimulation, release of neutrophil cytotoxic mediators was found to vary according to the type of stimulus provided: cell exposure to either larvae opsonized by antibody plus complement or to chemotactic factors provoked low-to-moderate cell release of superoxide anion, granule enzymes, and arginase; when opsonic and chemotactic stimuli were combined, a greater-than-additive secretory response was noted. Under such maximal stimulation, oxidative and nonoxidative mediators were synergistic in effecting neutrophil-mediated parasite killing. The primary function of complement in cell-mediated parasite killing appears to be to promote chemotactic-factor-mediated cellular release of toxic agents and not cell-target linkage, whereas antibody-mediated adherence is associated with concurrent cellular activation. Both neutrophils adherent to the antibody-opsonized schistosomulum and chemotactic-factor-stimulated cells (adherent and not adherent to the parasite) appear to contribute significantly to its demise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.