ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Concordance of 24-h intraocular pressure curve in patients with untreated unilateral primary open-angle glaucoma.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An online sample size calculator for designing partially clustered trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Nimodipine Combined with Latanoprost in Treating Open-Angle Glaucoma and Its Influence on Ocular Hemodynamics and Visual Field Defects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Routine Health Examination for Screening Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in Eastern China: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to assess the concordance of 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) curves between glaucomatous and contralateral eyes for patients with untreated unilateral primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). A total of 32 patients with unilateral POAG and 32 age-matched normal subjects were enrolled. The IOP measurements were performed every 2 h over a 24-h period. The concordance of the 24-h IOP curves was assessed via the correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). No significant difference was identified between all IOPs, as well as the mean, peak and trough IOP or IOP fluctuations of the paired eyes in the two groups. The strength of association of all IOPs was moderate in the glaucoma group (r, 0.752-0.867) and the normal controls (r, 0.625-0.873). IOP readings at each time-point indicated a high agreement in the glaucoma group (ICC, 0.857-0.929) and the normal controls (ICC, 0.768-0.932). Repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that the 24-h IOP curves of the paired eyes had parallel profiles in the two study groups (P=0.837 and P=0.897, respectively). The glaucoma patients had significantly higher proportions of all IOPs displaying absolute differences of ≥2 and ≥3 mmHg (46.09 vs. 35.68%, P<0.001; 29.69 vs. 12.50%, P<0.001, respectively). In conclusion, the 24-h IOP curves of the paired eyes had parallel profiles in unilateral glaucoma patients and normal subjects. However, unilateral glaucoma patients had a significantly larger proportion of IOP differences of ≥2 and ≥3 mmHg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.