ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Blood platelet and serum bilirubin in the diagnosis of central serous chorioretinopathy.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic value of blood platelet (PLT) and serum total bilirubin (TBIL) for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) was investigated. A total of 537 patients with CSC and 182 people with normal physical conditions were selected from June 2012 to August 2016. The 537 patients included 294 males and 243 females with an average age of 45.5±17.8 years, and all patients were treated in the Department of Ophthalmology of Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the Department of Ophthalmology of Yantai Liuhuangding Hospital. Clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. The 182 people with normal physical conditions included 103 males and 79 females with an average age of 43.6±15.2 years, and they were set as the control group. PLT and TBIL tests at admission and after treatment were collected and compared between CSC and the control group to analyze the diagnostic values of PLT and TBIL for CSC. PLT level in the CSC group was significantly higher than that in the control group, but TBIL level in the CSC group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p<0.05). Linear correlation analysis showed that PLT was a risk factor for CSC, and TBIL was a protective factor for CSC. The sensitivity of PLT and TBIL in diagnosis of CSC was 75.2 and 72.7%, respectively, and the specificity of PLT and TBIL in diagnosis of CSC was 65.8 and 63.3%, respectively. PLT of CSC patients was significantly higher than that of the control group, and TBIL of CSC patients was significantly lower than that of the control group, but they both gradually reduced to normal levels after treatment, which can be regarded as the index for the clinical diagnosis of CSC in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.