Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30116246›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

The Protein Corona as a Confounding Variable of Nanoparticle-Mediated Targeted Vaccine Delivery.

Matthias Bros, Lutz Nuhn, Johanna Simon, Lorna Moll, Volker Mailänder, Katharina Landfester, Stephan Grabbe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nanodrugs Targeting T Cells in Tumor Therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias BrosDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Lutz NuhnMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz, Germany.
Johanna SimonDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Lorna MollDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Volker MailänderDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina LandfesterMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz, Germany.
Stephan GrabbeDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanocarriers (NC) are very promising tools for cancer immunotherapy. Whereas conventional vaccines are based on the administration of an antigen and an adjuvant in an independent fashion, nanovaccines can facilitate cell-specific co-delivery of antigen and adjuvant. Furthermore, nanovaccines can be decorated on their surface with molecules that facilitate target-specific antigen delivery to certain antigen-presenting cell types or tumor cells. However, the target cell-specific uptake of nanovaccines is highly dependent on the modifications of the nanocarrier itself. One of these is the formation of a protein corona around NC after

Indexed as

Body FluidsCancer VaccinesHumansImmunotherapyNanoparticlesNeoplasmsProtein BindingProtein CoronaReceptors, ImmunologicTreatment OutcomeCancer VaccinesProtein CoronaReceptors, Immunologiccancer vaccinescell-specific targetingimmunotherapynanocarriersprotein corona

Identifiers

PMID30116246
PMCPMC6082927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.