Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30116227›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Bacterial Biomarkers of Marcellus Shale Activity in Pennsylvania.

Jeremy R Chen See, Nikea Ulrich, Hephzibah Nwanosike, Christopher J McLimans, Vasily Tokarev, Justin R Wright, Maria F Campa, Christopher J Grant, Terry C Hazen, Jonathan M Niles and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy R Chen SeeDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Nikea UlrichDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Hephzibah NwanosikeDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Christopher J McLimansDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Vasily TokarevDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Justin R WrightDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Maria F CampaThe Bredesen Center, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Christopher J GrantDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Terry C HazenThe Bredesen Center, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Jonathan M NilesFreshwater Research Initiative, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA, United States.
Daniel ResslerDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA, United States.
Regina LamendellaDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA, United States.
Juniata College · USSusquehanna University · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unconventional oil and gas (UOG) extraction, also known as hydraulic fracturing, is becoming more prevalent with the increasing use and demand for natural gas; however, the full extent of its environmental impacts is still unknown. Here we measured physicochemical properties and bacterial community composition of sediment samples taken from twenty-eight streams within the Marcellus shale formation in northeastern Pennsylvania differentially impacted by hydraulic fracturing activities. Fourteen of the streams were classified as UOG+, and thirteen were classified as UOG- based on the presence of UOG extraction in their respective watersheds. One stream was located in a watershed that previously had UOG extraction activities but was recently abandoned. We utilized high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to infer differences in sediment aquatic bacterial community structure between UOG+ and UOG- streams, as well as correlate bacterial community structure to physicochemical water parameters. Although overall alpha and beta diversity differences were not observed, there were a plethora of significantly enriched operational taxonomic units (OTUs) within UOG+ and UOG- samples. Our biomarker analysis revealed many of the bacterial taxa enriched in UOG+ streams can live in saline conditions, such as Rubrobacteraceae. In addition, several bacterial taxa capable of hydrocarbon degradation were also enriched in UOG+ samples, including Oceanospirillaceae. Methanotrophic taxa, such as Methylococcales, were significantly enriched as well. Several taxa that were identified as enriched in these samples were enriched in samples taken from different streams in 2014; moreover, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) revealed clustering between streams from the different studies based on the presence of hydraulic fracturing along the second axis. This study revealed significant differences between bacterial assemblages within stream sediments of UOG+ and UOG- streams and identified several potential biomarkers for evaluating and monitoring the response of autochthonous bacterial communities to potential hydraulic fracturing impacts.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene sequencingbiomarkersfrackinghalophilichydraulic fracturinghydrocarbonsMarcellus shalemicrobial communities

Identifiers

PMID30116227
PMCPMC6083035
OpenAlexW2884111836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.