Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115959›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2019

Non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: a review of current and emerging medical therapies.

Sigfred Ian R Alpajaro, Jerad A K Harris, Christopher P Evans

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Synthesis, preclinical evaluation, and first-in-human study of AlEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  10. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dysregulated Transcriptional Control in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Updates in advanced prostate cancer 2018.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2018
    Article
  17. Prostate Cancer in Latin America: Challenges and Recommendations.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sigfred Ian R AlpajaroDepartment of Urology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. sialpajaro@ucdavis.edu.
Jerad A K HarrisUniversity of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Christopher P EvansDepartment of Urology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
University of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (M0CRPC) is a heterogenous disease state affecting an estimated 100,000 men in the United States. Development of more sensitive modalities for detection of metastasis has altered the landscape of advanced prostate cancer, but M0CRPC has remained a condition that previously lacked FDA-approved treatment. The emerging data on new generation Androgen Receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors should address this gap in the management of such patients.

methodsWe reviewed and summarized the current literature for the definition, diagnosis and treatment of M0CRPC. We highlight the results of recent Phase III trials that show significant impact on the outcomes of M0CRPC.

resultsAndrogen deprivation therapy remains the foundation of therapy for M0CRPC. Recently published Phase III trials provided data on improved progression free survival when ADT is augmented with newer AR pathway inhibitors. The SPARTAN trial showed that metastasis-free survival (MFS) for patients treated with apalutamide plus ADT is 40.5 months compared to 16.2 months for patients who received standard ADT plus placebo, a 72% reduction in the risk of distant metastasis or death in apalutamide plus ADT compared to ADT plus placebo. The PROSPER trial demonstrated that MFS for patients treated with enzalutamide plus ADT was 36.6 months compared to 14.7 months for patients who received standard ADT only indicating a 71% reduction in the risk of developing metastatic CRPC or death compared to ADT alone. The ARAMIS trial on darolutamide, another AR pathway inhibitor, is also ongoing, and can potentially be another fitting option for M0CRPC.

conclusionThe recent Phase III trials SPARTAN and PROPSER demonstrate effective treatment options for the M0CRPC disease state that has historically lacked treatment from high level evidence. In particular, an FDA-approved treatment, Apalutamide, can finally be offered for M0CRPC patients. The newer AR pathway inhibitors should provide a basis for further investigation into treatments for M0CRPC.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDiagnostic ImagingDisease ManagementHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30115959
OpenAlexW2885698302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.