Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115822›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Graphene and Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for DNA Detection: A Review.

Xin Wu, Fengwen Mu, Yinghui Wang, Haiyan Zhao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin WuGeorge S. Ansell Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA. wuxin@mines.edu.
Fengwen MuDepartment of Precision Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan. mu.fengwen@su.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Yinghui WangKunshan Branch, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215347, China. wangyinghui@ime.ac.cn.
Haiyan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. hyzhao@tsinghua.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA detection with high sensitivity and specificity has tremendous potential as molecular diagnostic agents. Graphene and graphene-based nanomaterials, such as graphene nanopore, graphene nanoribbon, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide, graphene-nanoparticle composites, were demonstrated to have unique properties, which have attracted increasing interest towards the application of DNA detection with improved performance. This article comprehensively reviews the most recent trends in DNA detection based on graphene and graphene-related nanomaterials. Based on the current understanding, this review attempts to identify the future directions in which the field is likely to thrive, and stimulate more significant research in this subject.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesDNAElectrochemical TechniquesEquipment DesignGraphiteHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNanostructuresOxidesDNAGraphiteOxidesbiosensorsDNA detectiongraphenegraphene-based nanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID30115822
PMCPMC6222676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.