Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115766›Full record

SynthesisLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2018

Highway to hell or magic smoke? The dose-dependence of Δ

Rimas A Kubilius, Paul M Kaplick, Carsten T Wotjak

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ΔCannabis and cannabinoid research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Pharmacokinetic, behavioral, and brain activity effects of ΔNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  8. Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  9. Dissecting the role of CBEuropean neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  10. Effects of ∆BMC psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rimas A KubiliusNeuronal Plasticity Research Group, Department of Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Paul M KaplickNeuronal Plasticity Research Group, Department of Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Carsten T WotjakNeuronal Plasticity Research Group, Department of Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prerequisites for responsible cannabis use are at the heart of current inquiries into cannabis decriminalization by policy makers as well as academic and nonacademic stakeholders at a global scale. Δ

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsConditioning, ClassicalDronabinolMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID30115766
PMCPMC6097764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.