Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115678›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Value of Contrast-Enhanced MRA versus Time-of-Flight MRA in Acute Ischemic Stroke MRI.

T Boujan, U Neuberger, J Pfaff, S Nagel, C Herweh, M Bendszus, M A Möhlenbruch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Current state and advancements of imaging in acute ischemic stroke: a practical review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multimodal imaging approach for the diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD): Basic principles, current and future perspectives.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T BoujanFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (T.B., U.N., J.P., C.H., M.B., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-6709-0288
U NeubergerFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (T.B., U.N., J.P., C.H., M.B., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-3085-3886
J PfaffFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (T.B., U.N., J.P., C.H., M.B., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-0672-5718
S NagelNeurology (S.N.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-6647
C HerwehFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (T.B., U.N., J.P., C.H., M.B., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-9223-9662
M BendszusFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (T.B., U.N., J.P., C.H., M.B., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-9094-6769
M A MöhlenbruchFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (T.B., U.N., J.P., C.H., M.B., M.M.) markus.moehlenbruch@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5075-704X
MACOM (United States) · USHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeVessel imaging in acute ischemic stroke is essential to select patients with large-vessel occlusion for mechanical thrombectomy. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for identification of vessel occlusion and collateral status in acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred twenty-three patients with stroke with large-vessel occlusion before thrombectomy were included in this retrospective study. Before thrombectomy, 3T MR imaging, including conventional 3D TOF-MRA of the intracranial arteries and contrast-enhanced MRA of intra- and extracranial arteries, was performed. Both techniques were assessed independently by 2 neuroradiologists for location of the occlusion, imaging quality, and collateral status. Findings were compared, with subsequent DSA as the reference standard.

resultsBoth techniques had good interrater agreement of κ = 0.74 (95% CI, 0.66-0.83) for TOF-MRA and κ = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80) for contrast-enhanced MRA. Occlusion localization differed significantly on TOF-MRA compared with DSA (

conclusionsContrast-enhanced MRA offers better diagnostic accuracy than TOF-MRA in acute ischemic stroke. Contrast-enhanced MRA was superior in localizing vessel occlusion within a shorter acquisition time while providing a larger coverage, including extracranial vessels, and a more accurate assessment of collateral status. These results support inclusion of contrast-enhanced MRA in acute stroke MR imaging, perhaps making TOF-MRA superfluous.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStroke

Identifiers

PMID30115678
PMCPMC7655296
OpenAlexW2886615269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.