Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115639›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

The adverse health effects and harms related to marijuana use: an overview review.

K Ally Memedovich, Laura E Dowsett, Eldon Spackman, Tom Noseworthy, Fiona Clement

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Adherence to Lower-Risk Cannabis Use Guidelines among Canadian college students: a regression analysis.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cannabis-Associated Emergencies in the Emergency Department.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K Ally MemedovichThe Department of Community Health Sciences (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Noseworthy, Clement), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Laura E DowsettThe Department of Community Health Sciences (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Noseworthy, Clement), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Eldon SpackmanThe Department of Community Health Sciences (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Noseworthy, Clement), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Tom NoseworthyThe Department of Community Health Sciences (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Noseworthy, Clement), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Fiona ClementThe Department of Community Health Sciences (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Memedovich, Dowsett, Spackman, Noseworthy, Clement), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. fclement@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith impending marijuana legislation in Canada, a broad understanding of the harms associated with marijuana use is needed to inform the clinical community and public, and to support evidence-informed public policy development. The purpose of the review was to synthesize the evidence on adverse health effects and harms of marijuana use.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Health Technology Assessment Database from the inception of each database to May 2018. Given that systematic reviews evaluating one or other specific harm have been published, this is an overview review with the primary objective of assessing a health effect or harm. Data on author, country and year of publication, search strategy and results, and outcomes were extracted. Quality was assessed using the AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklist.

resultsThe final analysis included 68 reviews. Evidence of harm was reported in 62 reviews for several mental health disorders, brain changes, cognitive outcomes, pregnancy outcomes and testicular cancer. Inconclusive evidence was found for 20 outcomes (some mental health outcomes, other types of cancers and all-cause mortality). No evidence of harm was reported for 6 outcomes.

interpretationHarm was associated with most outcomes assessed. These results should be viewed with concern by physicians and policy-makers given the prevalence of use, the persistent reporting of a lack of recognition of marijuana as a possibly harmful substance and the emerging context of legalization for recreational use.

Identifiers

PMID30115639
PMCPMC6182105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.