Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115546›Full record

ReviewSeminars in fetal & neonatal medicine2018

A critical analysis of risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis.

Allison Thomas Rose, Ravi Mangal Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Remote ischaemic conditioning in necrotising enterocolitis: a phase I feasibility and safety study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2023
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Necrotizing enterocolitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Necrotizing enterocolitis following spontaneous intestinal perforation in very low birth weight neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allison Thomas RoseEmory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ravi Mangal PatelEmory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: rmpatel@emory.edu.

Funding

Red Cell Transfusion, Severe Anemia and Necrotizing EnterocolitisK23HL128942 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PATEL, RAVI MANGAL · 2016 to 2019
$665k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL128942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common serious gastrointestinal morbidity in preterm infants. A number of risk factors for NEC have been reported in the literature. With the exception of decreasing gestational age, decreasing birth weight and formula feeding, there is disagreement on the importance of reported risk factors with uncertain causality. Causal risk factors may be observed at any time before the onset of NEC, including prior to an infant's birth. The purpose of this review is to examine the existing literature and summarize risk factors for NEC. This review may be helpful in understanding the epidemiology of NEC and inform the measurement and assessment of risks factors for NEC in research studies and quality improvement projects.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureRisk FactorsEpidemiologyNecrotizing enterocolitisNeonatePrematurityRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID30115546
PMCPMC6269219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.