ArticleOral oncology2018
Staging HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer: Validation of AJCC-8 in a surgical cohort.
Article in Oral oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Smoking on Outcomes in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Chinese Cohort Under AJCC 8th Edition Staging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Indications and early experience with transoral robotic surgery].Magyar onkologia · 2024Article
- Transoral Robotic Surgery and Human Papillomavirus Infection: Impact on Oropharyngeal Cancer Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Extranodal Extension Improves AJCC-8 Accuracy in HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer in a High-Risk Population.The Laryngoscope · 2023Article
- Validation of the TNM-8 AJCC classification for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers in patients undergoing trans-oral robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Long-read sequencing of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma tumors reveal diverse patterns of high-risk Human Papillomavirus integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Circulating Human Papillomavirus DNA in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Possible Applications and Future Directions.Cancers · 2022Review
- Combined chemoradiotherapy showed improved outcome with early-stage HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: epidemiology, molecular biology and clinical management.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Awareness of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers among GPs in The Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.BJGP open · 2022Article
- Public awareness of the association between human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer.European journal of public health · 2021Article
- Deintensification of treatment for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer: Current state and future directions.Oral oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition (AJCC-8) contains a new staging system for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the AJCC-8 relative to the AJCC 7th edition (AJCC-7). MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed on a multi-institutional, prospectively collected dataset from two tertiary referral centers. All patients had HPV+ OPSCC treated primarily with surgery. The prognostic value of AJCC-7 and AJCC-8 were compared for 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DFS).
resultsAJCC-8 pathological staging effectively risk stratified patients, creating a Cox model with a better fit (lower Akaike's Information Criterion, p < 0.0001) when compared to AJCC-7 pathological stages for both OS and DFS. The AJCC-8 pathologic staging did not produce a better fit than the AJCC-8 clinical staging (p = 0.15) for OS, however, AJCC-8 pathologic was more effective than AJCC-8 clinical for DFS (p < 0.0001). 76% of patients did not change their stage between clinical and pathologic AJCC-8 staging; 14% were upstaged by 1, <1% were upstaged by 2, 7% were downstaged by 1, and 3% downstaged by 2. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The new AJCC-8 staging system represents a significant improvement over AJCC-7 for risk stratification into groups that predict overall survival and disease-specific survival of surgically treated HPV+ OPSCC patients. The AJCC- 8 pathologic staging system was not significantly better than the AJCC-8 clinical staging system for overall survival, however, the pathologic staging system was better than the clinical for disease free survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.