Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115111›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2018

Castleman disease versus lymphoma in neck lymph nodes: a comparative study using contrast-enhanced CT.

Jie Li, Jia Wang, Zhitao Yang, Hexiang Wang, Junyi Che, Wenjian Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spectrum of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie LiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Jia WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Qingdao Women and Children Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Zhitao YangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Hexiang WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Junyi CheDepartment of Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Wenjian XuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China. 13963952822@163.com.
Qingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNQingdao Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the contrast-enhanced CT characteristics for differentiating between Castleman disease (CD) and lymphoma in neck lymph nodes.

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated the number (solitary or multiple), strength of contrast-enhancement, type of contrast-enhancement, surrounding vessels, contrast-enhanced Hounsfield unit (HU) values, and anatomical distributions of lymph nodes in 34 patients with confirmed CD and 55 patients with newly diagnosed untreated lymphoma. Independent t-tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the variables and CT features.

resultsSeveral significant differences were found between CD and lymphoma. The interval between first contrast-enhanced CT and biopsy/surgery was significantly longer in the CD group (mean 72 ± 105 days, median 60 days) than in the lymphoma patients (mean 30 ± 2 days, median 12 days; p = 0.015). The lymphoma patients presented significantly more often with fatigue and fever (p = 0.023 and p = 0.016 respectively) than did the CD subjects. HU values of nodules after enhancement were significantly higher in the CD patients than in the lymphoma patients. In cases involving multiple lymph nodes, in all the CD cases, all affected nodes were located in only the left or right side of the neck, not bilaterally. ROC analysis showed a significant difference in contrast-enhanced CT attenuation values between lymphoma and CD (p < 0.001, area under the curve = 0.954), with a cut-off value of 92.5 HU. We constructed a decision tree according to these imaging characteristics.

conclusionsContrast-enhanced CT can be useful for differentiating between CD and lymphoma.

Indexed as

AdultCastleman DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLymph NodesLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedNeckTomography, X-Ray ComputedCastleman diseaseContrast-enhanced CTLymphomaNeck

Identifiers

PMID30115111
PMCPMC6097448
OpenAlexW2885592128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.