Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115105›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2018

High-frequency ultrasound of the skin in systemic sclerosis: an exploratory study to examine correlation with disease activity and to define the minimally detectable difference.

Hongyan Li, Daniel E Furst, Hongtao Jin, Chao Sun, Xiaoping Wang, Lin Yang, Jingjing He, Yanru Wang, Aijing Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel therapies and innovation for systemic sclerosis skin ulceration.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongyan LiDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Daniel E FurstDepartment of Rheumatology, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hongtao JinDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Chao SunDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xiaoping WangDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Lin YangDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jingjing HeDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yanru WangDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Aijing LiuDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. laj111@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5762-5592
Hebei Medical University · CNUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThickened skin is a major clinical feature in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). We investigated changes of skin thickness in patients with SSc using both high frequency ultrasound (HFU) and the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) to evaluate the feasibility of application of HFU in skin involvement and the relationship between HFU and clinical profiles.

methodsWe recruited 31 consecutive patients with SSc and 31 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Skin thickness was measured by an 18-MHz ultrasonic probe at five different skin sites. Total skin thickness (TST) and skin thickness using categorical mRSS scores were recorded and compared to HFU. The European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) group Disease Activity Index (EUSTAR-DAI) and other clinical manifestations were assessed and analyzed.

resultsTST in patients with SSc was thicker than in healthy controls (P < 0.001), and correlated positively with total mRSS and the EUSTAR-DAI and correlated negatively with disease duration (P < 0.05). Patients with higher TST had higher EUSTAR-DAI, mRSS, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lower diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P < 0.05). Even in patients who on clinical assessment were assigned an mRSS that suggested the skin thickness was normal. This was also true to mRSS locally of 1 and 2 (P < 0.01). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.831 and yielded sensitivity of 77.4% and specificity of 87.1% at the predicted probability of 7.4 mm as the optimal cutoff point to access skin thickness.

conclusionsIn the study, HFU was able to measure skin thickness, it correlated quantitatively with a valid measure of SSc activity, and a minimal detectable difference was identified.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesScleroderma, SystemicSensitivity and SpecificitySkinUltrasonographyDisease activityHigh frequency ultrasoundMinimal detectable differenceSkin thicknessSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID30115105
PMCPMC6097225
OpenAlexW2885287371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.