Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115054›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

A program evaluation of an in-school daily physical activity initiative for children and youth.

Emily Bremer, Jeffrey D Graham, Scott Veldhuizen, John Cairney

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03618927 (A Program Evaluation of an In-school Daily Physical Activity Initiative for Children and Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03618927 nacompletednot on this map

A Program Evaluation of an In-school Daily Physical Activity Initiative for Children and Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2016 to 2016Enrolled362ConditionsPhysical Activity, Children, OnlyArmsDaily physical activity intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of and Experiences with Classroom Physical Activity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily BremerDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Jeffrey D GrahamINfant and Child Health (INCH) Lab, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Scott VeldhuizenINfant and Child Health (INCH) Lab, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
John CairneyINfant and Child Health (INCH) Lab, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. john.cairney@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2856-3967
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe school system is one setting in which children's physical activity levels may be increased through daily physical activity (DPA) policies and initiatives. Adherence to DPA policies is typically poor and results are limited in regard to the associated benefits for participating children. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate a range of psychosocial outcomes following a community-led, in-school DPA initiative for 9-14 year old children and youth.

methodsThis program evaluation examined the impact of a DPA program consisting of 20 min of teacher-led DPA for 20 consecutive weeks. Student outcomes were measured using a questionnaire administered at three time points: baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. A teacher questionnaire regarding program adherence and student behaviour was completed at post-intervention. Mixed effects models were used to test for intervention effects, with random intercepts for students, classes, and schools, as well as fixed effects for age and sex. Due to the large number of outcomes measured, we first conducted an omnibus test of the intervention effect followed by three exploratory analyses examining each outcome separately, associations between outcomes and program adherence, and results from the teacher survey.

resultsThirty classes (N = 19 experimental) from 7 schools participated in the study, with a total of 362 children (n = 265 experimental). There was no significant overall effect of the intervention (z = 0.89, p = 0.38) and the exploratory analyses demonstrated significant differences only for self-esteem and subjective happiness, with the control group slightly increasing relative to the experimental group. Teacher-reported adherence to the program was poor with only 21% of teachers adhering to the program. There was no association between overall adherence and student reported outcomes; however, positive correlations were present between adherence and teacher-reported student behaviour.

conclusionsThe DPA program evaluated here did not improve the psychosocial well-being of elementary school-aged children more than usual practices. However, adherence to the program was poor and it did not have a negative effect on the students. Future work is needed on how best to support DPA implementation in the context of the school day and how student well-being may be positively impacted through school-based physical activity.

trial registrationProgram Evaluation of an in-school Daily Physical Activity Initiative NCT03618927 , August 6, 2018. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

ExerciseSchool Health ServicesAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesEducationHealth policyInterventionPsychosocial health

Identifiers

PMID30115054
PMCPMC6097410
OpenAlexW2886104497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.