Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30114565›Full record

ArticleJournal of health economics2018

Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Elaine L Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health economics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The public health impacts of mining in Australia.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. The Fire That Does Not Go Out: The Neglected Costs of Gas Flaring in Nigeria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The human health effects of unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD): A scoping review of epidemiologic studies.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  15. Short-Term Increases in NOEnvironmental science & technology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Mortality Effects of Winter Heating Prices.Economic journal (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  18. US drinking water quality: exposure risk profiles for seven legacy and emerging contaminants.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elaine L HillUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine & Dentistry, 265 Crittenden Blvd Box 420644, Rochester, NY 14642, United States. Electronic address: elaine_hill@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

The Health Consequences of Shale Gas DevelopmentDP5OD021338 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HILL, ELAINE L · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Research Infrastructure for Demographic and Behavioral Population ScienceR24HD058488 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LICHTER, DANIEL T. · 2008 to 2013
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD058488NIEHS NIH HHS L40 ES027225NIH HHS DP5 OD021338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research exploits the introduction of shale gas wells in Pennsylvania in response to growing controversy around the drilling method of hydraulic fracturing. Using detailed location data on maternal addresses and GIS coordinates of gas wells, this study examines singleton births to mothers residing close to a shale gas well from 2003 to 2010 in Pennsylvania. The introduction of drilling increased low birth weight and decreased term birth weight on average among mothers living within 2.5 km of a well compared to mothers living within 2.5 km of a permitted well. Adverse effects were also detected using measures such as small for gestational age and APGAR scores, while no effects on gestation periods were found. In the intensive margin, an additional well is associated with a 7 percent increase in low birth weight, a 5 g reduction in term birth weight and a 3 percent increase in premature birth. These results are robust to other measures of infant health, many changes in specification and falsification tests. These findings suggest that shale gas development poses significant risks to human health.

Indexed as

Infant HealthOil and Gas IndustryAir PollutionApgar ScoreBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, PrematureInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMaleNatural GasOil and Gas FieldsPennsylvaniaWater PollutionNatural GasAir pollutionInfant healthLow birth weightShale gas developmentWater pollution

Identifiers

PMID30114565
PMCPMC6629042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.