Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30114557›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2018

Splice-Modulating Oligonucleotide QR-110 Restores CEP290 mRNA and Function in Human c.2991+1655A>G LCA10 Models.

Kalyan Dulla, Monica Aguila, Amelia Lane, Katarina Jovanovic, David A Parfitt, Iris Schulkens, Hee Lam Chan, Iris Schmidt, Wouter Beumer, Lars Vorthoren and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Retinal organoids mirror CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing efficiency observedMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular treatment options for patients carryingMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Retinal Organoids: Innovative Tools for Understanding Retinal Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. PathogeniciScience · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kalyan DullaProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Monica AguilaUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Amelia LaneUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Katarina JovanovicUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
David A ParfittUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Iris SchulkensProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hee Lam ChanProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Iris SchmidtProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Wouter BeumerProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Lars VorthorenProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob W J CollinDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Alejandro GarantoDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lonneke DuijkersDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Anna Brugulat-PanesUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Ma'ayan SemoUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Anthony A VuglerUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Patricia BiasuttoProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Peter AdamsonProQR Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK. Electronic address: padamson@proqr.com.
Michael E CheethamUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK. Electronic address: michael.cheetham@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBProQR Therapeutics (Netherlands) · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205041/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leber congenital amaurosis type 10 (LCA10) is a severe inherited retinal dystrophy associated with mutations in CEP290. The deep intronic c.2991+1655A>G mutation in CEP290 is the most common mutation in LCA10 individuals and represents an ideal target for oligonucleotide therapeutics. Here, a panel of antisense oligonucleotides was designed to correct the splicing defect associated with the mutation and screened for efficacy and safety. This identified QR-110 as the best-performing molecule. QR-110 restored wild-type CEP290 mRNA and protein expression levels in CEP290 c.2991+1655A>G homozygous and compound heterozygous LCA10 primary fibroblasts. Furthermore, in homozygous three-dimensional iPSC-derived retinal organoids, QR-110 showed a dose-dependent restoration of mRNA and protein function, as measured by percentage and length of photoreceptor cilia, without off-target effects. Localization studies in wild-type mice and rabbits showed that QR-110 readily reached all retinal layers, with an estimated half-life of 58 days. It was well tolerated following intravitreal injection in monkeys. In conclusion, the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety properties make QR-110 a promising candidate for treating LCA10, and clinical development is currently ongoing.

Indexed as

oligonucleotideorganoidQR-110retinal dystrophystem celltherapy

Identifiers

PMID30114557
PMCPMC6092551
OpenAlexW2883897094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.