Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30114335›Full record

ReviewJournal of surgical oncology2018

Robotic (super) microsurgery: Feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions.

Tom J M van Mulken, Rutger M Schols, Shan S Qiu, Kaj Brouwers, Lisette T Hoekstra, Darren I Booi, Raimondo Cau, Ferry Schoenmakers, Andrea M J Scharmga, Rene R W J van der Hulst

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Robotic-assisted Lymphovenous Anastomosis of the Central Lymphatic System.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Robot-assisted Microsurgery: Lessons Learned from 50 Consecutive Cases.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. [Robotics in plastic surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Is There Room for Microsurgery in Robotic Surgery?Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. The History and Innovations of Blood Vessel Anastomosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tom J M van MulkenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rutger M ScholsDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-2075
Shan S QiuDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kaj BrouwersDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lisette T HoekstraDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Darren I BooiDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Raimondo CauDepartment of Medical Robotics Technologies, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ferry SchoenmakersDepartment of Medical Robotics Technologies, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Andrea M J ScharmgaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rene R W J van der HulstDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced microsurgical procedures are currently limited by human precision and manual dexterity. The potential of robotics in microsurgery is highlighted, including a general overview of applications of robotic assistance in microsurgery and its introduction in different surgical specialties. A new robotic platform especially designed for (super) microsurgery is presented. Results of an in vivo animal study underline its feasibility and encourage further development toward clinical studies. Future directions of robotic microsurgery are proposed.

Indexed as

MicrosurgeryRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsAorta, AbdominalEquipment DesignFemoral ArteryHumansModels, AnimalSurgical Procedures, Operativemicrosurgeryrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30114335
PMCPMC6221079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.