Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30114296›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Pre-clinical evaluation of quinoxaline-derived chalcones in tuberculosis.

Thaís C Muradás, Bruno L Abbadi, Anne D Villela, Fernanda S Macchi, Pedro F Bergo, Talita F de Freitas, Nathalia D M Sperotto, Luis F S M Timmers, Osmar Norberto de Souza, Jaqueline N Picada and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chalcone: A Promising Bioactive Scaffold in Medicinal Chemistry.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Quinoxaline Moiety: A Potential Scaffold againstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thaís C MuradásCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Bruno L AbbadiCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4336-1282
Anne D VillelaCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Fernanda S MacchiCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Pedro F BergoCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-0075
Talita F de FreitasCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Nathalia D M SperottoCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Luis F S M TimmersLaboratório de Bioinformática, Modelagem e Simulação de Biossistemas, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Osmar Norberto de SouzaLaboratório de Bioinformática, Modelagem e Simulação de Biossistemas, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jaqueline N PicadaLaboratory of Toxicological Genetics, Lutheran University of Brazil (ULBRA), Canoas, Brazil.
Jean FachiniLaboratory of Toxicological Genetics, Lutheran University of Brazil (ULBRA), Canoas, Brazil.
Juliana Bondan da SilvaLaboratory of Toxicological Genetics, Lutheran University of Brazil (ULBRA), Canoas, Brazil.
Nayara C P de AlbuquerqueDepartamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Maísa D HabenschusDepartamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Daniel B CarrãoDepartamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Bruno A RochaLaboratório de Toxicologia e Essencialidade de Metais, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7893-758X
Fernando Barbosa JuniorLaboratório de Toxicologia e Essencialidade de Metais, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Anderson R M de OliveiraDepartamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Alessandra MascarelloDepartamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Patrícia NeuenfeldfDepartamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Ricardo J NunesDepartamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Héctor R MorbidoniLaboratorio de Microbiología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Rosario, Argentina.
Maria M CamposCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Luiz A BassoCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0903-2407
Valnês S Rodrigues-JuniorCentro de Pesquisas em Biologia Molecular e Funcional (CPBMF) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Tuberculose (INCT-TB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4849-2249
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Luterana do Brasil · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRNational University of Rosario · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New effective compounds for tuberculosis treatment are needed. This study evaluated the effects of a series of quinoxaline-derived chalcones against laboratorial strains and clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis. Six molecules, namely N5, N9, N10, N15, N16, and N23 inhibited the growth of the M. tuberculosis H37Rv laboratorial strain. The three compounds (N9, N15 and N23) with the lowest MIC values were further tested against clinical isolates and laboratory strains with mutations in katG or inhA genes. From these data, N9 was selected as the lead compound for further investigation. Importantly, this chalcone displayed a synergistic effect when combined with moxifloxacin. Noteworthy, the anti-tubercular effects of N9 did not rely on inhibition of mycolic acids synthesis, circumventing important mechanisms of resistance. Interactions with cytochrome P450 isoforms and toxic effects were assessed in silico and in vitro. The chalcone N9 was not predicted to elicit any mutagenic, genotoxic, irritant, or reproductive effects, according to in silico analysis. Additionally, N9 did not cause mutagenicity or genotoxicity, as revealed by Salmonella/microsome and alkaline comet assays, respectively. Moreover, N9 did not inhibit the cytochrome P450 isoforms CYP3A4/5, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. N9 can be considered a potential lead molecule for development of a new anti-tubercular therapeutic agent.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseChalconesCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisMycolic AcidsOxidoreductasesQuinoxalinesTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseChalconesCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemInhA protein, MycobacteriumkatG protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisMycolic AcidsOxidoreductasesQuinoxalines

Identifiers

PMID30114296
PMCPMC6095594
OpenAlexW2886043285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.