Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30114257›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice on endotracheal suctioning of the intubated patient: A quantitative cross-sectional observational study.

Emelia T Mwakanyanga, Golden M Masika, Edith A M Tarimo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04327076 (Clinical Application of Magnetically Guided Endotracheal Intubation and Airway Cleaning Robot System), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04327076 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Application of Magnetically Guided Endotracheal Intubation and Airway Cleaning Robot System

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled10ConditionsGeneral AnesthesiaArmsUsing robot system of endotracheal intubation and airway cleaning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Audit on Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning in Intensive Care Unit Patients among Health Care Workers (HCWs).Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Airway management training program for nursesWorld journal of methodology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [2020 clinical practice guidelines of endotracheal suctioning in neonates with mechanical ventilation].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Critical Care Nurses' Knowledge of Tracheostomy Care.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emelia T MwakanyangaMUHAS Academic Medical Centre (MAMC), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-6927-4267
Golden M MasikaSchool of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Edith A M TarimoDepartment of Nursing Management, School of Nursing, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndotracheal suction (ETS) is a common invasive procedure which is done to keep the airways patent by mechanically removing accumulated pulmonary secretions to all in patients with artificial airways. Many life-threatening complications can occur when the procedure is not performed correctly. Although the evidence-based recommendations regarding ETS are available, many of these have not been observed in nurse's clinical practice. We assessed the intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice of ETS to intubated patients in selected hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional study design involving 103 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses in Dar es Salaam city was conducted in 2014. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 where descriptive statistics were employed to interpret data.

resultsMajority of ICU nurses (69.9%) knew the indication for the procedure, (77.7%) knew the action to be taken in case of abrupt change in the ECG monitor; however, 80.6% demonstrated undesirable overall knowledge on ETS evidence-based recommendations. Nurses with ICU training (57.3%) significantly demonstrated higher knowledge of ETS than non-trained nurses (P<0.005), while all other factors had no influence. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Majority of ICU nurses do not have desirable knowledge and skills of ETS, and are currently not following current ETS recommendations. This study has shown that training on ICU skills have positive influence to recommended ETS knowledge. We recommend ICU training, provision of clinical guidelines and adequate support to nurses employed in ICUs. Also, further studies using analytical approach to identify other factors beyond the scope of this study and testing the best approach in fostering adherence to ETS evidence-based recommendations are crucial.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCritical Care NursingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntubation, IntratrachealNursesSuctionCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, NursingElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMale

Identifiers

PMID30114257
PMCPMC6095500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.