Observational studyPloS one2018
Intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice on endotracheal suctioning of the intubated patient: A quantitative cross-sectional observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04327076 (Clinical Application of Magnetically Guided Endotracheal Intubation and Airway Cleaning Robot System), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Application of Magnetically Guided Endotracheal Intubation and Airway Cleaning Robot System
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Level of Knowledge on External Ventricular Drain Care: A National Study of Neurosurgical and General ICU Nurses.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Article
- Effects of endotracheal suctioning duration cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Observational
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of an Automatic Closed-Suction System in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Pneumonia: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority, Investigator-Initiated Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Knowledge Level of ICU Nurses Regarding Nutritional Assessment of Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Review
- Audit on Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning in Intensive Care Unit Patients among Health Care Workers (HCWs).Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Performance checklist and its influence on knowledge and satisfaction of intensive care nurses: A quasi-experimental study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Adherence of critical care nurses to endotracheal suctioning guidelines: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Airway management training program for nursesWorld journal of methodology · 2022Article
- Investigation of the airway management practice of emergency department ward nurses: a nationwide survey in China.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice of evidence-based recommendations for endotracheal suctioning: a multisite cross-sectional study in Changsha, China.BMC nursing · 2021Article
- [2020 clinical practice guidelines of endotracheal suctioning in neonates with mechanical ventilation].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020Article
- Improving nurses' knowledge of managing endotracheal tube cuff pressure in intensive care units: A quasi-experimental study.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2020Article
- The effect of performance feedback and educational video on endotracheal-suctioning practices of critical care nurses.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020Article
- Preventing mucus plugging in invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients-routine or personalized care and 'primum non nocere'.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Critical Care Nurses' Knowledge of Tracheostomy Care.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Intensive Care Nurses' Performance of Open versus Closed Endotracheal Suction on Critically Ill Patients in Ismailia City.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndotracheal suction (ETS) is a common invasive procedure which is done to keep the airways patent by mechanically removing accumulated pulmonary secretions to all in patients with artificial airways. Many life-threatening complications can occur when the procedure is not performed correctly. Although the evidence-based recommendations regarding ETS are available, many of these have not been observed in nurse's clinical practice. We assessed the intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice of ETS to intubated patients in selected hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional study design involving 103 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses in Dar es Salaam city was conducted in 2014. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 where descriptive statistics were employed to interpret data.
resultsMajority of ICU nurses (69.9%) knew the indication for the procedure, (77.7%) knew the action to be taken in case of abrupt change in the ECG monitor; however, 80.6% demonstrated undesirable overall knowledge on ETS evidence-based recommendations. Nurses with ICU training (57.3%) significantly demonstrated higher knowledge of ETS than non-trained nurses (P<0.005), while all other factors had no influence. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Majority of ICU nurses do not have desirable knowledge and skills of ETS, and are currently not following current ETS recommendations. This study has shown that training on ICU skills have positive influence to recommended ETS knowledge. We recommend ICU training, provision of clinical guidelines and adequate support to nurses employed in ICUs. Also, further studies using analytical approach to identify other factors beyond the scope of this study and testing the best approach in fostering adherence to ETS evidence-based recommendations are crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.