Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30114235›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI as an imaging biomarker for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of primary renal cell carcinoma.

Hayley M Reynolds, Bimal K Parameswaran, Mary E Finnegan, Diana Roettger, Eddie Lau, Tomas Kron, Mark Shaw, Sarat Chander, Shankar Siva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hayley M ReynoldsDepartment of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8146-1113
Bimal K ParameswaranCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mary E FinneganDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Diana RoettgerImage Analysis Group, London, United Kingdom.
Eddie LauCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1261-7775
Tomas KronDepartment of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mark ShawDivision of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sarat ChanderSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shankar SivaSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBInstitute of Group Analysis · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the utility of diffusion and perfusion changes in primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) as an early biomarker of treatment response, using diffusion weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.

methodsPatients enrolled in a prospective pilot clinical trial received SABR for primary RCC, and had DWI and DCE MRI scheduled at baseline, 14 days and 70 days after SABR. Tumours <5cm diameter received a single fraction of 26 Gy and larger tumours received three fractions of 14 Gy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were computed from DWI data and parametric and pharmacokinetic maps were fitted to the DCE data. Tumour volumes were contoured and statistics extracted. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were computed between MRI parameter changes versus the percentage tumour volume change from CT at 6, 12 and 24 months and the last follow-up relative to baseline CT.

resultsTwelve patients were eligible for DWI analysis, and a subset of ten patients for DCE MRI analysis. DCE MRI from the second follow-up MRI scan showed correlations between the change in percentage voxels with washout contrast enhancement behaviour and the change in tumour volume (ρ = 0.84, p = 0.004 at 12 month CT, ρ = 0.81, p = 0.02 at 24 month CT, and ρ = 0.89, p = 0.001 at last follow-up CT). The change in mean initial rate of enhancement and mean Ktrans at the second follow-up MRI scan were positively correlated with percent tumour volume change at the 12 month CT onwards (ρ = 0.65, p = 0.05 and ρ = 0.66, p = 0.04 at 12 month CT respectively). Changes in ADC kurtosis from histogram analysis at the first follow-up MRI scan also showed positive correlations with the percentage tumour volume change (ρ = 0.66, p = 0.02 at 12 month CT, ρ = 0.69, p = 0.02 at last follow-up CT), but these results are possibly confounded by inflammation.

conclusionDWI and DCE MRI parameters show potential as early response biomarkers after SABR for primary RCC. Further prospective validation using larger patient cohorts is warranted.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMaleRadiosurgeryContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID30114235
PMCPMC6095575
OpenAlexW2886508785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.