Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30113999›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

A Predictive Risk Scoring System for Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Wuzheng Xia, Yu Zhou, Ye Lin, Min Yu, Zi Yin, Xin Lu, Baohua Hou, Zhixiang Jian

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05654636 (Evaluation of Sun's Scoring System Use in Post-pancraticodoudenectomy Pancreatic Fistula; an Observational Cohort Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05654636 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Sun's Scoring System Use in Post-pancraticodoudenectomy Pancreatic Fistula; an Observational Cohort Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsRisk Scoring System for Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula Post PD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wuzheng XiaSouthern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Yu ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Ye LinDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Min YuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Zi YinDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Xin LuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Baohua HouDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Zhixiang JianSouthern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains a challenge after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to establish a scoring system to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after PD. MATERIAL AND METHODS The clinical records of 361 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2009 and 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into a study group (225 patients) and a validation group (136 patients). CR-POPF was defined and classified based on the 2016 ISGPS definition and classification system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed and we thus developed a scoring system based on the regression coefficient of the multivariate logistic regression model. The predictive value was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS A predictive scoring system with a maximum of 6 points for CR-POPF was established using the following 4 factors: 1 point for soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.10-3.98, P=0.025), 1.5 points for main pancreatic duct diameter ≤2.5 mm (OR 2.72, 95%CI 1.23-5.99, P=0.013), 0.5 points for extended lymphadenectomy (OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.13-2.18, P=0.007), 0.5 points for a 25-30 g/L postoperative day 1 serum albumin (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.02-2.00, P=0.037), and 3 points for postoperative day 1 serum albumin ≤25 g/L (OR 5.12, 95%CI 1.82-14.41, P=0.002). The ROC curve showed that this scoring system was highly predictive for CR-POPF in the validation group (AUC=0.806, 95%CI: 0.735-0.878). CONCLUSIONS This 6-point risk scoring system will be useful for perioperative risk management of CR-POPF.

Indexed as

Research DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID30113999
PMCPMC6108272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.