Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30113724›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2018

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Rising Doses of BI 655064, an Antagonistic Anti-CD40 Antibody, in Healthy Subjects: A Potential Novel Treatment for Autoimmune Diseases.

Christian Schwabe, Bernd Rosenstock, Thi Doan, Paul Hamilton, P Rod Dunbar, Anastasia G Eleftheraki, David Joseph, James Hilbert, Corinna Schoelch, Steven J Padula and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. FcγRs and Their Relevance for the Activity of Anti-CD40 Antibodies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. B Cell Aberrance in Lupus: the Ringleader and the Solution.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Emerging Therapies in Immune Thrombocytopenia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Christian SchwabeAuckland Clinical Studies Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bernd RosenstockBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Thi DoanBoehringer Ingelheim Pty Limited, North Ryde, Australia.
Paul HamiltonAuckland Clinical Studies Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
P Rod DunbarSchool of Biological Sciences and Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anastasia G EleftherakiBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
David JosephBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA.
James HilbertBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Corinna SchoelchBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Steven J PadulaBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Jürgen SteffgenBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Biberach, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USAuckland Institute of Studies · NZBoehringer Ingelheim (Australia) · AUMaurice Wilkins Centre · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BI 655064 is a humanized antagonistic anti-cluster of differentiation (CD) 40 monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks the CD40-CD40L interaction. The CD40-CD40L pathway is a promising treatment target for autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and lupus nephritis. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of repeated once-weekly BI 655064 subcutaneous dosing over 4 weeks were evaluated in a multiple-dose study in healthy subjects. Subjects (N = 40) were randomized 4:1 to four sequential BI 655064 dose groups (80, 120, 180, 240 mg) or to placebo. Safety and tolerability, plasma exposure, CD40 receptor occupancy, and CD40L-induced CD54 upregulation were assessed over 64 and 78 days for the 80- to 180-mg and 240-mg dose groups, respectively. BI 655064 exposure increased in a supraproportional manner, due to target-mediated drug clearance, for doses between 80 mg and 120 mg, but was near proportional for doses greater than 120 mg. Terminal half-life ranged between 6 and 8 days. Dose-dependent accumulation of BI 655064 supports the use of a loading dose in future clinical studies. Following 4 weeks of dosing, >90% CD40 receptor occupancy and inhibition of CD54 upregulation were observed at all dose levels, lasting for 17 days after the last dose. BI 655064 was generally well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events and the frequency and intensity of adverse events were similar for BI 655064 and placebo; no dose relationship or relevant signs of an acute immune reaction were observed. These findings support further investigation of BI 655064 as a potential treatment for autoimmune diseases.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedArea Under CurveAutoimmune DiseasesCD40 AntigensDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBI 655064CD40 Antigensanti-CD40healthy subjectslupus nephritismultiple rising doserheumatoid arthritissystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID30113724
PMCPMC6282763
OpenAlexW2885335124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.