Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30113428›Full record

ReviewPancreas2018

Pancreatic Cancer-Induced Cachexia and Relevant Mouse Models.

Sally E Henderson, Neil Makhijani, Thomas A Mace

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pancreas, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A review of physical activity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Epidemiology, intervention, animal models, and clinical trials.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Nutrition challenges of cancer cachexia.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sally E Henderson
Neil MakhijaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.
Thomas A Mace

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR001068 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
Mouse Pathobiology: Models of Human DiseaseT32OD010429 · OD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NIEWIESK, STEFAN, OGLESBEE, MICHAEL J · 2012 to 2017
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001068NIH HHS T32 OD010429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with projections that it will become the second leading cause by the year 2030. It carries a dismal prognosis with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 9% and is associated with numerous comorbidities, the most notable being cachexia. Defined as the loss of muscle mass not reversible by conventional nutritional support, cachexia is seen in over 85% of pancreatic cancer patients and contributes significantly to mortality, where nearly 30% of pancreatic cancer deaths are due to cachexia rather than tumor burden. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify the mechanisms behind the development of muscle wasting in pancreatic cancer patients and design novel therapeutics targeting cachexia. This review highlights the current understanding surrounding the mechanisms underpinning the development of cachexia in pancreatic cancer, as well as the current mouse models of pancreatic cancer-induced muscle wasting described in the literature.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCachexiaCytokinesHumansMiceMuscle WeaknessPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSignal TransductionTumor BurdenCytokines

Identifiers

PMID30113428
PMCPMC6097247
OpenAlexW2885398462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.