Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30113391›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2019

Renal Resistive Index: Response to Shock and its Determinants in Critically Ill Patients.

Sander Rozemeijer, Jelle L G Haitsma Mulier, Jantine G Röttgering, Paul W G Elbers, Angélique M E Spoelstra-de Man, Pieter Roel Tuinman, Monique C de Waard, Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Monitoring of renal perfusion.Intensive care medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sander RozemeijerAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jelle L G Haitsma Mulier
Jantine G Röttgering
Paul W G Elbers
Angélique M E Spoelstra-de Man
Pieter Roel Tuinman
Monique C de Waard
Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShock is characterized by micro- and macrovascular flow impairment contributing to acute kidney injury (AKI). Routine monitoring of the circulation regards the macrocirculation but not the renal circulation which can be assessed with Doppler ultrasound as renal resistive index (RRI). RRI reflects resistance to flow. High RRI predicts persistent AKI. Study aims were to determine whether RRI is elevated in shock and to identify determinants of RRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective observational cohort study included two cohorts of patients, with and without shock less than 24-h after intensive care admission. Apart from routine monitoring, three study measurements were performed simultaneously: RRI, sublingual microcirculation, and bioelectral impedance analysis.

resultsA total of 92 patients were included (40 shock, 52 nonshock), median age was 69 [60-76] vs. 67 [59-76], P = 0.541; APACHE III was 87 [65-119] vs. 57 [45-69], P < 0.001. Shock patients had higher RRI than patients without shock (0.751 [0.692-0.788] vs. 0.654 [0.610-0.686], P < 0.001). Overall, high age, APACHE III score, lactate, vasopressor support, pulse pressure index (PPI), central venous pressure (CVP), fluid balance, and low preadmission estimated glomerular filtration rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), creatinine clearance, and reactance/m were associated with high RRI at univariable regression (P < 0.01). Microcirculatory markers were not. At multivariable regression, vasopressor support, CVP, PPI and MAP, reactance/m, and preadmission eGFR were independent determinants of RRI (n = 92, adj. R = 0.587).

conclusionsPatients with shock have a higher RRI than patients without shock. Independent determinants of high RRI were pressure indices of the systemic circulation, low membrane capacitance, and preadmission renal dysfunction. Markers of the sublingual microcirculation were not.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAcute Kidney InjuryAgedAPACHECohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedProspective StudiesShock

Identifiers

PMID30113391
PMCPMC6587221
OpenAlexW2887234436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.