Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30113370›Full record

ReviewCritical care medicine2018

Translational Sepsis Research: Spanning the Divide.

Anthony J Lewis, Janet S Lee, Matthew R Rosengart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinically relevant model of pneumococcal pneumonia, ARDS, and nonpulmonary organ dysfunction in mice.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony J LewisDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Janet S LeeDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Matthew R RosengartDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

TRAINING IN TRAUMA AND SEPSIS RESEARCHT32GM008516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TIMOTHY R BILLIAR · 1994 to 2026
$9.4M
Mechanisms of host protection against pathogen-secreted proteases in acute lung injuryR01HL136143 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, JANET SOJUNG · 2017 to 2024
$4.4M
Red Cell Tranfusion: Modifier of Lung and Systemic Inflammatory ResponsesR01HL086884 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEE, JANET SOJUNG · 2007 to 2017
$4.0M
CaMK: Central Regulators of the response to Surgical SepsisR01GM082852 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROSENGART, MATTHEW RANDALL · 2009 to 2020
$3.0M
The role of ACOD1 in immunomodulation in intrapulmonary Klebsiella pneumoniae infectionR01HL142084 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHEN, KONG · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
Blue light protects against ischemia induced organ injuryR01GM116929 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROSENGART, MATTHEW RANDALL · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL086884NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136143NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142084NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082852NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116929NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of sepsis has attained exponential growth. Yet, the pillars of its care remain antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and physiologic support of failing organ systems. The inability to bring biologic breakthroughs to the bedside is not for lack of effort. Over 60 clinical trials of novel therapies, each heavily supported by the momentum of biologic data suggesting clinical utility, have been conducted and have failed to identify benefit. This mass of "negative" clinical data abut an equally towering mound of knowledge of sepsis biology, which collectively have led investigators to ask, "what happened?" DATA SOURCES: Review of published scientific literature via MEDLINE searches using key terms related to the article topics. STUDY SELECTION: Original articles, review articles, and systematic reviews were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were selected for inclusion based upon author consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: Here, we present a synthetic review of some of the challenges in translating experimental animal models of sepsis to the bedside. We commence with the concept that the heterogeneity in the kinetics of the sepsis response serves as an important, often underappreciated but surmountable, source of translational impedance. Upon this groundwork, we discuss distinctions between animal experimentation and clinical trial design in the elements for hypothesis testing: cohort selection, power and sample size, randomization and blinding, and timing of intervention. From this concept, we develop a contextual framework for advancing the paradigm of animal-based investigations to facilitate science that transitions from molecule to medicine.

conclusionsA persistent divide exists between the laboratory and clinical research arenas, which may be addressable via systematic targeting of identified translational gaps.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansSepsis

Identifiers

PMID30113370
PMCPMC6097250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.