Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30113282›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2018

Use of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder polygenic risk scores to identify psychotic disorders.

Maria Stella Calafato, Johan H Thygesen, Siri Ranlund, Eirini Zartaloudi, Wiepke Cahn, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Álvaro Díez-Revuelta, Marta Di Forti, Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) consortium, Mei-Hua Hall and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Maria Stella CalafatoDivision of Psychiatry,University College London,UK.
Johan H ThygesenDivision of Psychiatry,University College London,UK.
Siri RanlundDivision of Psychiatry,University College London,UK.
Eirini ZartaloudiDivision of Psychiatry,University College LondonandInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Wiepke CahnDepartment of Psychiatry,Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus,University Medical Center Utrecht,the Netherlands.
Benedicto Crespo-FacorroCIBERSAM,Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red Salud Mental,MadridandDepartment of Psychiatry,University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria-IDIVAL,Spain.
Álvaro Díez-RevueltaDivision of Psychiatry,University College London,London,UKandLaboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience - Centre for Biomedical Technology (CTB),Complutense University and Technical University of Madrid,Spain.
Marta Di FortiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) consortium
Mei-Hua HallPsychosis Neurobiology Laboratory,Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital,USA.
Conrad IyegbeInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Assen JablenskyCentre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry,The University of Western Australia,Australia.
Rene KahnDepartment of Psychiatry,Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus,University Medical Center Utrecht,the Netherlands.
Luba KalaydjievaHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research and Centre for Medical Research,The University of Western Australia,Australia.
Eugenia KravaritiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Kuang LinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustandNuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,UK.
Colm McDonaldThe Centre for Neuroimaging & Cognitive Genomics (NICOG) and NCBES Galway Neuroscience Centre,National University of Ireland Galway,Ireland.
Andrew M McIntoshDivision of Psychiatry,University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh HospitalandCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology,University of Edinburgh,UK.
Andrew McQuillinDivision of Psychiatry,University College London,UK.
Marco PicchioniInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Dan RujescuDepartment of Psychiatry,Ludwig-Maximilians University of MunichandDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,University of Halle Wittenberg,Germany.
Madiha ShaikhNorth East London Foundation TrustandResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology,University College London,UK.
Timothea ToulopoulouInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK and Department of Psychology,Bilkent University,Turkey.
Jim Van OsInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UKandDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology,Maastricht University Medical Centre, EURON,the Netherlands.
Evangelos VassosInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Muriel WalsheDivision of Psychiatry,University College LondonandInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
John PowellInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Cathryn M LewisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Robin M MurrayInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
Elvira BramonDivision of Psychiatry and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience,University College London and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
University College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Western Australia · AUBilkent University · TREuropean Graduate School of Neuroscience · NLInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ESLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMcLean Hospital · USOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IERoyal Edinburgh Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDA/02/06/016Medical Research Council G0901310Medical Research Council MC_PC_16014Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Wellcome Trust 085475/B/08/ZWellcome Trust 085475/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing evidence for shared genetic susceptibility between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Although genetic variants only convey subtle increases in risk individually, their combination into a polygenic risk score constitutes a strong disease predictor.AimsTo investigate whether schizophrenia and bipolar disorder polygenic risk scores can distinguish people with broadly defined psychosis and their unaffected relatives from controls.

methodUsing the latest Psychiatric Genomics Consortium data, we calculated schizophrenia and bipolar disorder polygenic risk scores for 1168 people with psychosis, 552 unaffected relatives and 1472 controls.

resultsPatients with broadly defined psychosis had dramatic increases in schizophrenia and bipolar polygenic risk scores, as did their relatives, albeit to a lesser degree. However, the accuracy of predictive models was modest.

conclusionsAlthough polygenic risk scores are not ready for clinical use, it is hoped that as they are refined they could help towards risk reduction advice and early interventions for psychosis.Declaration of interestR.M.M. has received honoraria for lectures from Janssen, Lundbeck, Lilly, Otsuka and Sunovian.

Indexed as

AdultAustraliaBipolar DisorderCase-Control StudiesEuropeFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultifactorial InheritancePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsBipolar disorderpolygenicpolygenic risk scorespredictionpsychotic disordersschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30113282
PMCPMC6130805
OpenAlexW2885674345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.