Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30112941›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2019

A five-year follow-up observational study of the T-14 paediatric throat disorders outcome measure in tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy.

K M Konieczny, T N Pitts-Tucker, T C Biggs, M B Pringle

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K M KoniecznyPortsmouth Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Portsmouth , UK.
T N Pitts-TuckerUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust , Southampton , UK.
T C BiggsUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust , Southampton , UK.
M B PringlePortsmouth Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Portsmouth , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe T-14 questionnaire is a validated outcome measurement tool to assess the value of paediatric tonsillectomy from a parent's perspective. There is a paucity of data regarding the long-term postoperative effects of tonsillectomy on quality of life in the paediatric population. Our previous study assessed T-14 scores up to year 2 postoperatively, with this study extending follow-up to 5 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe undertook a prospective uncontrolled observational study examining 54 paediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy at Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust. Parents of children undergoing surgery were invited to complete a T-14 questionnaire preoperatively, as well as at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and now 5 years postoperatively.

resultsIn total, 44 of 54 patients completed questionnaires preoperatively and at all postoperative time points, with 46 being completed at 5 years. There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) difference between the preoperative scores and all other measured T-14 scores postoperatively. The mean score preoperatively was 33.3 compared with 1.0 at 5 years.

conclusionsThis is the first study to assess long-term quality of life following paediatric tonsillectomy using the T-14 questionnaire. The benefits of tonsillectomy on long-term quality of life further confirms its value within the paediatric population.

Indexed as

AdenoidectomyTonsillectomyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleParentsPharyngeal DiseasesProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeOutcome measuresQuality of lifeTonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID30112941
PMCPMC6303835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.