ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2018
Evaluation of automatic contour propagation in T2-weighted 4DMRI for normal-tissue motion assessment using internal organ-at-risk volume (IRV).
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A super-resolution framework for the reconstruction of T2-weighted (T2w) time-resolved (TR) 4DMRI using T1w TR-4DMRI as the guidance.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Simulated accuracy assessment of small footprint body-mounted probe alignment device for MRI-guided cryotherapy of abdominal lesions.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019Article
- Respiratory-Correlated (RC) vs. Time-Resolved (TR) Four-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4DMRI) for Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Abdominal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Comparative Evaluation of 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography and 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Delineate the Target of Primary Liver Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of automatically propagated contours of organs at risk (OARs) based on respiratory-correlated navigator-triggered four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (RC-4DMRI) for calculation of internal organ-at-risk volume (IRV) to account for intra-fractional OAR motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: T2-weighted RC-4DMRI images were of 10 volunteers acquired and reconstructed using an internal navigator-echo surrogate and concurrent external bellows under an IRB-approved protocol. Four major OARs (lungs, heart, liver, and stomach) were delineated in the 10-phase 4DMRI. Two manual-contour sets were delineated by two clinical personnel and two automatic-contour sets were propagated using free-form deformable image registration. The OAR volume variation within the 10-phase cycle was assessed and the IRV was calculated as the union of all OAR contours. The OAR contour similarity between the navigator-triggered and bellows-rebinned 4DMRI was compared. A total of 2400 contours were compared to the most probable ground truth with a 95% confidence level (S95) in similarity, sensitivity, and specificity using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm.
resultsVisual inspection of automatically propagated contours finds that approximately 5-10% require manual correction. The similarity, sensitivity, and specificity between manual and automatic contours are indistinguishable (P > 0.05). The Jaccard similarity indexes are 0.92 ± 0.02 (lungs), 0.89 ± 0.03 (heart), 0.92 ± 0.02 (liver), and 0.83 ± 0.04 (stomach). Volume variations within the breathing cycle are small for the heart (2.6 ± 1.5%), liver (1.2 ± 0.6%), and stomach (2.6 ± 0.8%), whereas the IRV is much larger than the OAR volume by: 20.3 ± 8.6% (heart), 24.0 ± 8.6% (liver), and 47.6 ± 20.2% (stomach). The Jaccard index is higher in navigator-triggered than bellows-rebinned 4DMRI by 4% (P < 0.05), due to the higher image quality of navigator-based 4DMRI.
conclusionAutomatic and manual OAR contours from Navigator-triggered 4DMRI are not statistically distinguishable. The navigator-triggered 4DMRI image provides higher contour quality than bellows-rebinned 4DMRI. The IRVs are 20-50% larger than OAR volumes and should be considered in dose estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.