Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30112616›Full record

ReviewJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2018

Cardiac automaticity: basic concepts and clinical observations.

Hector M Vetulli, Marcelo V Elizari, Gerald V Naccarelli, Mario D Gonzalez

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Visualization and mapping of the right phrenic nerve by intracardiac echocardiography during atrial fibrillation ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Five-year results of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in patients after heart transplantation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Physiological Roles of the Rapidly Activated Delayed Rectifier KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. 2019 Ludwig Lecture: Rhythms in sympathetic nerve activity are a key to understanding neural control of the cardiovascular system.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Hypotensive and Antihypertensive Properties and Safety for Use ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hector M VetulliElectrophysiology Department, Sanatorio Otamendi and Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcelo V ElizariAcademia Nacional de Medicina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gerald V NaccarelliClinical Electrophysiology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State University Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State University College of Medicine, 500 University Dr. Room H 1344K, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Mario D GonzalezClinical Electrophysiology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State University Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State University College of Medicine, 500 University Dr. Room H 1344K, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. mgonzalez@pennstatehealth.hmc.psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0755-9611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this report was to review the basic mechanisms underlying cardiac automaticity. Second, we describe our clinical observations related to the anatomical and functional characteristics of sinus automaticity.

methodsWe first reviewed the main discoveries regarding the mechanisms responsible for cardiac automaticity. We then analyzed our clinical experience regarding the location of sinus automaticity in two unique populations: those with inappropriate sinus tachycardia and those with a dominant pacemaker located outside the crista terminalis region.

resultsWe studied 26 patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia (age 34 ± 8 years; 21 females). Non-contact endocardial mapping (Ensite 3000, Endocardial Solutions) was performed in 19 patients and high-density contact mapping (Carto-3, Biosense Webster with PentaRay catheter) in 7 patients. The site of earliest atrial activation shifted after each RF application within and outside the crista terminalis region, indicating a wide distribution of atrial pacemaker sites. We also analyzed 11 patients with dominant pacemakers located outside the crista terminalis (age 27 ± 7 years; five females). In all patients, the rhythm was the dominant pacemaker both at rest and during exercise and located in the right atrial appendage in 6 patients, in the left atrial appendage in 4 patients, and in the mitral annulus in 1 patient. Following ablation, earliest atrial activation shifted to the region of the crista terminalis at a slower rate.

conclusionsMembrane and sub-membrane mechanisms interact to generate cardiac automaticity. The present observations in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia and dominant pacemakers are consistent with a wide distribution of pacemaker sites within and outside the boundaries of the crista terminalis.

Indexed as

Body Surface Potential MappingAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultCardiac CatheterizationCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCatheter AblationCohort StudiesEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMalePrognosisProspective StudiesSinoatrial NodeTachycardia, SinusTreatment OutcomeCalcium clockCardiac automaticitySinus node

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.