Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30112615›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2018

Branched Chain Amino Acids in Metabolic Disease.

Zoltan Arany, Michael Neinast

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. PlasmaMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zoltan AranyCardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, TRC 11-106 3400 Civic Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. zarany@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Michael NeinastCardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, TRC 11-106 3400 Civic Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Selective mTORC1 inhibition to prevent and treat NAFLD and NASHR01DK107667 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARANY, ZOLTAN P · 2016 to 2025
$5.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK107667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewElevations in circulating branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) have gained attention as potential contributors to the development of insulin resistance and diabetes. RECENT

findingsEpidemiological evidence strongly supports this conclusion. Suppression of BCAA catabolism in adipose and hepatic tissues appears to be the primary drivers of plasma BCAA elevations. BCAA catabolism may be shunted to skeletal muscle, where it indirectly leads to FA accumulation and insulin resistance, via a number of proposed mechanisms. BCAAs have an important role in the development of IR, but our understanding of how plasma BCAA elevations occur, and how these elevations lead to insulin resistance, is still limited.

Indexed as

Amino Acids, Branched-ChainHumansInsulin ResistanceMetabolic DiseasesMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalAmino Acids, Branched-ChainBranched chain amino acidsCatabolismDiabetesInsulin resistance

Identifiers

PMID30112615
OpenAlexW2886108104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.