Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30112074›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018

Value of D-dimer levels for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: An analysis of 32 cases with computed tomography pulmonary angiography.

Hui Gao, Hu Liu, Yanjing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hui GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.
Hu LiuCardiovascular Medicine Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi 716000, P.R. China.
Yanjing LiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi 716000, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

D-dimer levels correlate with the extent of pulmonary embolism (PE) on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), but the use of D-dimer alone for screening and diagnosing PE remains controversial. This study compared the utility of plasma D-dimer levels for diagnosing PE with that of CTPA (gold standard). This was a retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients with suspected PE at the Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University between OctoberC 2010 and March 2011. Blood was sampled before thrombolytic therapy was administered. D-dimer levels were measured using an automatic system. CTPA was used to diagnose PE and was performed within 48 h of blood sampling using a Siemens Somatom Sensation 64 computed tomography (CT) scanner. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of D-dimer levels, with CTPA as the gold standard. Among the 32 patients, CTPA identified 26 patients with PE and 6 patients without obvious abnormality. Using a threshold value of 1.3 µg/ml for D-dimer level, the diagnosis of PE was achieved with a sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 50.0%, positive predictive value of 89.3%, negative predictive value of 75.0% and accuracy of 87.5%. D-dimer levels were significantly higher in patients positive for PE on CTPA than in those negative for PE on CTPA (9.85±7.14 vs. 2.82±2.65 µg/ml, P=0.001). Based on ROC curve analysis, the optimal threshold value for D-dimer level in the diagnosis of PE was 1.9 µg/ml. To conclude, D-dimer could be a simple, fast and inexpensive screening method for excluding a diagnosis of PE.

Indexed as

64-slice spiral computer tomographyD-dimerpulmonary angiographypulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID30112074
PMCPMC6090438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.