ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Identification of key genes and pathways for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating analysis of multi-omics summary data identifies novel plasma protein biomarkers and drug targets for bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Unveiling the potential of SLURP1 protein as a biomarker for prostate cancer screening.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Altered genome‑wide hydroxymethylation analysis for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in esophageal cancer.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Overexpression of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its clinical significance.FEBS open bio · 2021Article
- Oncogenic enhancers drive esophageal squamous cell carcinogenesis and metastasis.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Crosstalk between MMP-13, CD44, and TWIST1 and its role in regulation of EMT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2021Article
- Crosstalk between MEIS1 and markers of different cell signaling pathways in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Time series expression pattern of key genes reveals the molecular process of esophageal cancer.Bioscience reports · 2020Article
- Cellular Processes Involved in Jurkat Cells Exposed to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in esophageal squamous-cellcarcinoma (ESCC) and provide potential therapeutic targets. The microarray dataset GSE20347 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and included 17 tissue samples and 13 normal adjacent tissue samples from patients with ESCC. A total of 22,277 DEGs were identified. A heat map for the DEGs was constructed with the Morpheus online tool and the top 200 genes (100 upregulated and 100 downregulated) were selected for further bioinformatics analysis, including analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, protein-protein interaction networks and Spearman's correlation tests. The results of the GO analysis indicated that the upregulated DEGs were most significantly enriched in membrane-bounded vesicles in the cellular component (CC) category, but were not significantly enriched in any GO terms of the categories biological process (BP) or molecular function (MF); furthermore, the downregulated DEGs were most significantly enriched in regulation of DNA metabolic processes, nucleotide binding and chromosomes in the categories BP, MF and CC, respectively. The KEGG analysis indicated that the downregulated DEGs were enriched in the regulation of cell cycle pathways. The top 10 hub proteins in the protein-protein interaction network were cyclin-dependent kinase 4, budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1, cyclin B2, heat shock protein 90AA1, aurora kinase A, H2A histone family member Z, replication factor C subunit 4, and minichromosome maintenance complex component 2, -4 and -7. These proteins are mainly involved in regulating tumor progression. The genes in the four top modules were mainly implicated in regulating cell cycle pathways. Secreted Ly-6/uPAR-related protein (SLURP) was the hub gene, and SLURP and its interacting genes were most enriched in the chromosomal part in the CC category, organelle organization in the BP category and protein binding in the MF category, and were involved in pathways including DNA replication, cell cycle and P53 signaling. The expression of SLURP-1 in fifteen patients with esophageal carcinoma was detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, and the results indicated that SLURP-1 expression was significantly decreased in the tumor samples relative to that in normal adjacent tissues. These results suggest that several hub proteins and the hub gene SLURP-1 may serve as potential therapeutic targets, and that gene dysfunction may be involved in the tumorigenesis of ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.