Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111849›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Electrophysiological correlates of the interplay between low-level visual features and emotional content during word reading.

Sebastian Schindler, Antonio Schettino, Gilles Pourtois

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N170.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vocal threat enhances visual perception as a function of attention and sex.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. FamFac - A Database of Famous Faces for Psychology Experiments.International journal of psychological research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian SchindlerDepartment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. sebastian.schindler@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7054-5431
Antonio SchettinoDepartment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8065-6082
Gilles PourtoisDepartment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEBielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing affectively charged visual stimuli typically results in increased amplitude of specific event-related potential (ERP) components. Low-level features similarly modulate electrophysiological responses, with amplitude changes proportional to variations in stimulus size and contrast. However, it remains unclear whether emotion-related amplifications during visual word processing are necessarily intertwined with changes in specific low-level features or, instead, may act independently. In this pre-registered electrophysiological study, we varied font size and contrast of neutral and negative words while participants were monitoring their semantic content. We examined ERP responses associated with early sensory and attentional processes as well as later stages of stimulus processing. Results showed amplitude modulations by low-level visual features early on following stimulus onset - i.e., P1 and N1 components -, while the LPP was independently modulated by these visual features. Independent effects of size and emotion were observed only at the level of the EPN. Here, larger EPN amplitudes for negative were observed only for small high contrast and large low contrast words. These results suggest that early increase in sensory processing at the EPN level for negative words is not automatic, but bound to specific combinations of low-level features, occurring presumably via attentional control processes.

Indexed as

ReadingAdultAttentionElectroencephalographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaEmotionsEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSemanticsVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30111849
PMCPMC6093870
OpenAlexW2885197001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.