Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111814›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Angiogenic response of rat hippocampal vasculature to focused ultrasound-mediated increases in blood-brain barrier permeability.

Dallan McMahon, Ethan Mah, Kullervo Hynynen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A review of bioeffects induced by focused ultrasound combined with microbubbles on the neurovascular unit.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Analysis of glucose metabolism byScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  13. A High-Frequency Phased Array System for Transcranial Ultrasound Delivery in Small Animals.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Applications of Ultrasound to Stimulate Therapeutic Revascularization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dallan McMahonSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada. dallan.mcmahon@mail.utoronto.ca.
Ethan MahSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Kullervo HynynenSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada.

Funding

Ultrasound Therapy Delivery Through Intact SkullR01EB003268 · NIBIB · SUNNYBROOK & WOMEN'S COLL HLTH SCIS CTR · PI HYNYNEN, KULLERVO · 2003 to 2020
$8.2M
Canadian Institutes for Health Research FRN 119312NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) and circulating microbubbles can induce a targeted and transient increase in blood-brain barrier permeability. While preclinical research has demonstrated the utility of FUS for efficacious drug deliver to the brain, there remain gaps in our knowledge regarding the long-term response of brain vasculature to this intervention. Previous work has demonstrated transcriptional changes in hippocampal microvessels following sonication that are indicative of the initiation of angiogenic processes. Moreover, blood vessel growth has been reported in skeletal muscle following application of FUS and microbubbles. The current study demonstrates that blood vessel density in the rat hippocampus is modestly elevated at 7 and 14 d post-FUS compared to the contralateral hemisphere (7 d: 10.9 ± 6.0%, p = 0.02; 14 d: 12.1 ± 3.2%, p < 0.01), but returns to baseline by 21 d (5.9 ± 2.6%, p = 0.12). Concurrently, relative newborn endothelial cell density and frequency of small blood vessel segments were both elevated in the sonicated hippocampus. While further work is required to determine the mechanisms driving these changes, the findings presented here may have relevance to the optimal frequency of repeated treatments.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsBiological TransportBlood-Brain BarrierCapillary PermeabilityCerebrovascular CirculationDrug Delivery SystemsHippocampusMaleMicrobubblesNeovascularization, PhysiologicRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonic WavesAngiogenesis Inducing Agents

Identifiers

PMID30111814
PMCPMC6093874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.