Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Lower genital tract cytokine profiles in South African women living with HIV: influence of mucosal sampling.

Shameem Z Jaumdally, Lindi Masson, Heidi E Jones, Smritee Dabee, Donald R Hoover, Hoyam Gamieldien, Nontokozo Langwenya, Landon Myer, Catherine S Todd, Jo-Ann S Passmore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shameem Z JaumdallyDivision of Medical Virology, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lindi MassonDivision of Medical Virology, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Heidi E JonesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Smritee DabeeDivision of Medical Virology, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Donald R HooverDepartment of Statistics and Biostatistics, Rutgers University, Rutgers, New Jersey, USA.
Hoyam GamieldienDivision of Medical Virology, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nontokozo LangwenyaDivision of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research (CIDER), School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Landon MyerDivision of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research (CIDER), School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Catherine S ToddReproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Division, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jo-Ann S PassmoreDivision of Medical Virology, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa. Jo-ann.Passmore@uct.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-1471-4245
University of Cape Town · ZACity University of New York · USFamily Health International 360 · USNational Health Laboratory Service · ZARutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Safety and Acceptability of Two IUDs among Cape Town HIV-positive Women: A RCTR01HD071804 · NICHD · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI MYER, BENJAMIN LANDON, TODD, CATHERINE SUZANNE · 2012 to 2017
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement of cytokines in the lower female genital tract offer insight into risk for HIV infection and reproductive complications. However, few studies have systematically compared mucosal collection methods or whether collection order matters. We compared longitudinal cytokine profiles in matched genital samples collected from women living with HIV using menstrual cup (MC), endocervical swabs (ECS) and swab-enriched cervicovaginal lavage (eCVL). Samples were collected at enrollment [MC:ECS:eCVL], 3-months (ECS:eCVL:MC) and 6-months (eCVL:MC:ECS) and concentrations of 28 cytokines determined by Luminex. Cytokine clustering was assessed using Principle Component Analysis (PCA), Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLSDA) and factor analysis. Generally, higher cytokine concentrations were detected in MC samples, followed by ECS and eCVL, irrespective of study visit or sampling order. Factor analysis and PCA identified ECS to be inferior for measuring regulatory cytokines and IP-10 than eCVL or MC. Although concentrations differed, the majority of cytokines correlated between methods. Sampling order influenced cytokine concentrations marginally, and cytokines clustered more strongly by method than study visit. Variance in profiles was lowest in MC, suggesting greater consistency of sampling compared to other methods. We conclude that MC sampling offered advantages over other methods for detecting cytokines in women, with order marginally influencing profiles.

Indexed as

AdultCervix UteriCytokinesFemaleGenitalia, FemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMenstrual Hygiene ProductsMucous MembraneSouth AfricaSpecimen HandlingVaginaVaginal DouchingCytokines

Identifiers

PMID30111808
PMCPMC6093917
OpenAlexW2885573793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.