Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111539›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Control of the Restriction Point by Rb and p21.

Justin Moser, Iain Miller, Dylan Carter, Sabrina L Spencer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A low-level Cdkn1c/p57EMBO reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The GScience advances · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Transient ZnProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The G1/S transition is promoted by Rb degradation via the E3 ligase UBR5.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin MoserDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303.
Iain MillerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303.
Dylan CarterDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303.
Sabrina L SpencerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303; sabrina.spencer@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5798-3007
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

TRAINING IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION &CELL CYCLE REGULATIONT32GM008759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI AHN, NATALIE G. · 2000 to 2020
$5.9M
Predoctoral Training Program in Signaling and Cellular Regulation INCLUDE Down Syndrome SupplementT32GM142607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Sabrina Leigh Spencer, Tin Tin Su · 2021 to 2026
$3.6M
FACSAria Fusion Cell SorterS10OD021601 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI LIU, XUEDONG · 2016 to 2016
$599k
Proliferation-quiescence control by integration of stress and mitogen signalingK22CA188144 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SPENCER, SABRINA LEIGH · 2014 to 2016
$578k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA188144NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008759NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142607NIH HHS S10 OD021601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Restriction Point was originally defined as the moment that cells commit to the cell cycle and was later suggested to coincide with hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). Current cell cycle models posit that cells exit mitosis into a pre-Restriction Point state, where they have low cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity and hypophosphorylated Rb; passage through the Restriction Point then occurs in late G1. Recent single-cell studies have challenged the current paradigm, raising questions about the location of the Restriction Point and the notion that cells exit mitosis into a pre-Restriction Point state. Here, we use a variety of single-cell techniques to show that both noncancer and cancer cells bifurcate into two subpopulations after anaphase, marked by increasing vs. low CDK2 activity and hyper- vs. hypophosphorylation of Rb. Notably, subpopulations with hyper- and hypophosphorylated Rb are present within minutes after anaphase, delineating one subpopulation that never "uncrosses" the Restriction Point and continues cycling and another subpopulation that exits mitosis into an uncommitted pre-Restriction Point state. We further show that the CDK inhibitor p21 begins rising in G2 in mother cells whose daughters exit mitosis into the pre-Restriction Point, CDK2

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalProteolysisCell CycleCell Line, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21HumansRetinoblastoma ProteinCDK2 protein, humanCDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Retinoblastoma ProteinCDK2cell cycleG0quiescencerestriction point

Identifiers

PMID30111539
PMCPMC6126733
OpenAlexW2887366292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.