Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111477›Full record

ArticleZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2018

[Developmental level of joint attention ability in children aged 16-30 months and related influencing factors].

Yu Xiao, Cui-Hua Guo, Jie-Ling Wu, De-Yi Liang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu XiaoDepartment of Child Health Care, Guangdong Women and Children's Hospital, Guangzhou 510000, China. jieling101@189.cn.
Cui-Hua Guo
Jie-Ling Wu
De-Yi Liang
Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the developmental level of joint attention ability in children aged 16-30 months and factors influencing the developmental level.

methodsA questionnaire survey was performed among 1 675 children aged 16-30 months who visited the Department of Child Health Care in Guangdong Women and Children's Hospital between September and December, 2016 to investigate their joint attention ability and related influencing factors.

resultsOf the 1 675 children, 1 579 (94.27%) had reactive joint attention ability at the age of 16-30 months, and 1 428 (85.25%) had active joint attention ability. The percentages of children with reactive joint attention ability and active joint attention ability in boys were lower than in girls (P<0.001). Mother's age, father's occupation, annual family income, way of conception, intended or unintended pregnancy, and mode of delivery were factors influencing the total score of joint attention ability and the scores of reactive/active joint attention ability (P<0.05).

conclusionsMost children have reactive joint attention ability and active joint attention ability at the age of 16-30 months. During this period of age, boys tend to have poorer joint attention ability than girls. Mother's age, father's occupation, annual family income, way of conception, intended or unintended pregnancy, and mode of delivery are associated with the development of joint attention.

Indexed as

AttentionChild DevelopmentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleParentsPregnancyPsychology, ChildSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30111477
PMCPMC7389762
OpenAlexW2989755774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.