Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111341›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2018

Effect of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with infection and sepsis patients: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Yannick Wirz, Marc A Meier, Lila Bouadma, Charles E Luyt, Michel Wolff, Jean Chastre, Florence Tubach, Stefan Schroeder, Vandack Nobre, Djillali Annane and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04203524 (Impact of a Procalcitonin-Guided Algorithm on Antimicrobial Utilization in Critically Ill Cancer Patients with Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 109 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04203524 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Procalcitonin-Guided Algorithm on Antimicrobial Utilization in Critically Ill Cancer Patients with Sepsis: a Randomized Controlled Study (Pro-Can)

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Hussein Cancer CenterRan2019 to 2023Enrolled157ConditionsSepsis, Septic Shock, Neoplasm, Critical IllnessArmsProcalcitonin Levels, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. The PRECISE framework: a structured approach to antibiogram interpretation for antimicrobial optimization at the bedside.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  13. Risk factors associated with apyrexia during bacteraemia: a prospective multicenter cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 17 institutions in 7 countries.

Yannick WirzMedical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Marc A MeierMedical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Lila BouadmaService de Réanimation Médicale, Université Paris 7-Denis-Diderot, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Charles E LuytService de Réanimation Médicale, Université Paris 6-Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Paris, France.
Michel WolffService de Réanimation Médicale, Université Paris 7-Denis-Diderot, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Jean ChastreService de Réanimation Médicale, Université Paris 6-Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Paris, France.
Florence TubachDépartement d'Epidémiologie Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine, Paris, France.
Stefan SchroederDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Krankenhaus Dueren, Dueren, Germany.
Vandack NobreDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital das Clinicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Djillali AnnaneCritical Care Department, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Garches, France.
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Pierre DamasDepartment of General Intensive Care, University Hospital of Liege, Domaine universitaire de Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Maarten NijstenUniversity Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arezoo ShajieiUniversity Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dylan W deLangeUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rodrigo O DeliberatoLaboratory for Critical Care Research, Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carolina F OliveiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Yahya ShehabiCritical Care and Peri-operative Medicine, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Jos A H van OersElisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Albertus BeishuizenMedisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Armand R J GirbesVU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Evelien de JongVU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Beat MuellerMedical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Philipp SchuetzMedical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland. schuetzph@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-4949
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRKantonsspital Aarau · CHSorbonne Université · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Basel · CHCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRJena University Hospital · DEKrankenhaus Düren · DEMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLMonash Health · AUUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical utility of serum procalcitonin levels in guiding antibiotic treatment decisions in patients with sepsis remains unclear. This patient-level meta-analysis based on 11 randomized trials investigates the impact of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy on mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with infection, both overall and stratified according to sepsis definition, severity, and type of infection.

methodsFor this meta-analysis focusing on procalcitonin-guided antibiotic management in critically ill patients with sepsis of any type, in February 2018 we updated the database of a previous individual patient data meta-analysis which was limited to patients with respiratory infections only. We used individual patient data from 11 trials that randomly assigned patients to receive antibiotics based on procalcitonin levels (the "procalcitonin-guided" group) or the current standard of care (the "controls"). The primary endpoint was mortality within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were duration of antibiotic treatment and length of stay.

resultsMortality in the 2252 procalcitonin-guided patients was significantly lower compared with the 2230 control group patients (21.1% vs 23.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8 to 0.99; p = 0.03). These effects on mortality persisted in a subgroup of patients meeting the sepsis 3 definition and based on the severity of sepsis (assessed on the basis of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, occurrence of septic shock or renal failure, and need for vasopressor or ventilatory support) and on the type of infection (respiratory, urinary tract, abdominal, skin, or central nervous system), with interaction for each analysis being > 0.05. Procalcitonin guidance also facilitated earlier discontinuation of antibiotics, with a reduction in treatment duration (9.3 vs 10.4 days; adjusted coefficient -1.19 days, 95% CI -1.73 to -0.66; p <  0.001).

conclusionProcalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment in ICU patients with infection and sepsis patients results in improved survival and lower antibiotic treatment duration.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayOrgan Dysfunction ScoresProcalcitoninRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersProcalcitoninAntibiotic stewardshipMeta-analysisProcalcitoninSepsis

Identifiers

PMID30111341
PMCPMC6092799
OpenAlexW2885215440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.