Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111307›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

"Everything else comes first": a mixed-methods analysis of barriers to health behaviors among military spouses.

Emily L Mailey, Carrie Mershon, Jillian Joyce, Brandon C Irwin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05726539 (The Military Spouse Resiliency Group), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05726539 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Military Spouse Resiliency Group (MSRG) Peer Support Program: Equipping Families For Resiliency With Tools (EFFRT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2024 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsMilitary FamilyArmsGroup-based peer support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Special Concerns in Military Families.Current psychiatry reports · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Piloting the home ship: Understanding the deployment experience of Canadian Special Operations Forces Command spouses.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily L MaileyDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, 8 Natatorium, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA. emailey@ksu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-445X
Carrie MershonDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, 8 Natatorium, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Jillian JoyceDepartment of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics and Health, Kansas State University, 213 Justin Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Brandon C IrwinDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, 8 Natatorium, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Kansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMilitary spouses are integral to the health of their families, but have demonstrated elevated levels of stress, depression, and anxiety. Participating in health behaviors such as physical activity and healthy eating may have a positive impact on spouses' physical and mental health, but emerging evidence suggests spouses' participation in these behaviors is scarce. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the most frequently reported barriers to health behaviors among military spouses.

methodsMilitary spouses were recruited to complete surveys (N = 230) or participate in focus group sessions (N = 22). On the surveys, participants indicated up to 3 of their most frequent barriers to physical activity, diet, social connection, and stress management. Responses were coded and summed to identify the most commonly reported barriers to each health behavior. Subsequently, focus group sessions were conducted to gain a more in-depth understanding of the challenges military spouses face when trying to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Focus group transcripts were coded using thematic data analysis to identify the most frequently discussed barriers for each behavior.

resultsOn the surveys, lack of time was the most prevalent barrier for physical activity, social connection, and stress management, and the second most prevalent barrier for diet. Financial concerns were the most prevalent barrier to maintaining a healthy diet. Barriers related to parent/family responsibilities were commonly reported across all health behaviors. During the focus group sessions, the transient military lifestyle was reported to have a significant impact on all of the health behaviors. Other military-related stressors including deployments and the necessity to "do it all" alone were frequently discussed. Many participants exhibited rigid definitions of what "counts" as exercise or health eating. Overall, participants reported sacrificing participation in health behaviors to attend to other priorities.

conclusionsMilitary spouses reported numerous barriers to health behaviors that made it difficult for them to prioritize their own health and well-being. Although some of the barriers reported were similar to barriers reported by civilians, unique stressors associated with military life further impeded participation in health behaviors. These findings can be used to inform future health promotion interventions for military spouses.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorMilitary PersonnelAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansSpousesStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesArmyBarriersDietMilitary spousesPhysical activitySocial supportStress

Identifiers

PMID30111307
PMCPMC6094922
OpenAlexW2887868905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.