Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111302›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2018

A systematic review of co-responder models of police mental health 'street' triage.

Stephen Puntis, Devon Perfect, Abirami Kirubarajan, Sorcha Bolton, Fay Davies, Aimee Hayes, Eli Harriss, Andrew Molodynski

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Comparative Study of Community-Based Management Models of Schizophrenia at Home and Abroad].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Matching Mobile Crisis Models to Communities: An Example from Northwestern Ontario.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2024
    Article
  17. Persons with mental disorders and suicidality in crisis or high-risk situations involving police negotiation: a systematic review.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen PuntisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK. Stephen.puntis@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-2435
Devon PerfectOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Abirami KirubarajanMD Program, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Sorcha BoltonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Fay DaviesOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Aimee HayesCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Wayside House, Wilsons Lane Coventry, Warwickshire, CV6 6NY, UK.
Eli HarrissBodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrew MolodynskiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolice mental health street triage is an increasingly common intervention when dealing with police incidents in which there is a suspected mental health component. We conducted a systematic review of street triage interventions with three aims. First, to identify papers reporting on models of co-response police mental health street triage. Second, to identify the characteristics of service users who come in to contact with these triage services. Third, to evaluate the effectiveness of co-response triage services.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review. We searched the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Thompson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection, The Cochrane Library, ProQuest National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, EThoS, and OpenGrey. We searched reference and citation lists. We also searched for other grey literature through Google, screening the first 100 PDFs of each of our search terms. We performed a narrative synthesis of our results.

resultsOur search identified 11,553 studies. After screening, 26 were eligible. Over two-thirds (69%) had been published within the last 3 years. We did not identify any randomised control trials. Results indicated that street triage might reduce the number of people taken to a place of safety under S136 of the Mental Health Act where that power exists, or reduce the use of police custody in other jurisdictions.

conclusionsThere remains a lack of evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of street triage and the characteristics, experience, and outcomes of service users. There is also wide variation in the implementation of the co-response model, with differences in hours of operation, staffing, and incident response.

Indexed as

Criminal BehaviorMental HealthCriminal LawHumansLaw EnforcementMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPoliceTriageCrisis teamMental health crisisPolice and mental healthStreet triage

Identifiers

PMID30111302
PMCPMC6094921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.